why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?

[franksolich]

I went to wikipedia to look up some things.

Much to my surprise, Fat Che doesn't appear to be mentioned there any more, nor does his "White Rose Society."

I even got so desperate as to look for the biography of a late red round one, and that's not there.

All this stuff used to be on wikipedia.

[miskie]

Ive taken a look, and found the discussions for the deletion of these entities, circa 2006, 2007 for the website.

late red round one
Fat Che
White Rose Society

[JohnnyReb]

I read the comments to all 3 articles.

"The person is non-notable".....you know that has to hurt a liberals ego....

It hurts when even your fellow liberals tell you....you don't amount to $#!^....

[franksolich]

Ive taken a look, and found the discussions for the deletion of these entities, circa 2006, 2007 for the website.

late red round one
Fat Che
White Rose Society

Thank you, sir: I went to each of the three links.

I was sort of outdated on Fat Che, who won't let me register at the Rancid Rhodes message board despite that I'm aboveboard about it; the last I had heard, Fat Che was leaving wikipedia, but then reconsidered.  Apparently he did leave.

Fat Che made it sound like his leaving would be a detriment to wikipedia.

Yeah, sure.

With the subtraction of these three articles, wikipedia added to its credibility.

I always suspected Fat Che had sockpuppet-written the now-gone entries about himself and his stupid web-site; blatant self-promotion.

I think I'll visit wikipedia more often, now that Fat Che isn't pompously waddling around, looking very much like a grossly obese rooster preening its inadequate feathers.  Fat Che always tried giving the impression he owned the place. 

[Rebel]

RE: Andy Stephenson:

# *STRONG KEEP* Andy is clearly notable as any thinking person would know. Attempts to delete this fine man are evidence of the hand of Rove at work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.159.148.121 (talk • contribs)