The problem I have with a condemned person is the drain of that person on the system.
If the condemned is in a position to reimburse the state for his 3 hots, a cot, clothes, medical and dental care, along with an assessment of what it takes to keep the sumbitch warm in the winter and cool in the summer, I'd say go ahead and keep the bastard alive.
The second he can't pony up the cash, the execution date is set.
Agree that too many lawyers get involved in this, but what are you going to do in a country that has more lawyers per capita than any other country in the world?
Syndicated columnist Charley Reese stated:
I favor a fair trial, one quick appeal and prompt execution. I don't think murderers ought to live much beyond 12 months from the day their victim is buried...[and] As for not being able to correct a mistake, so what? Virtually all accidental deaths are deaths by mistake. Why impose a standard of perfection only on the criminal justice system? There are no perfect human institutions. Our system is, more than any other, designed to protect the rights of the defendant. The chance of a truly innocent person being executed is exceedingly slim. But if it happens, it happens just as things happen to people every day.
A pro DP web site