Author Topic: Is the media angling for a bailout of their own?  (Read 634 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Is the media angling for a bailout of their own?
« on: December 14, 2008, 12:45:12 AM »
I've seen a few stories directly addressing a "bailout" for the media.  The rest of them seem to dance around the subject as subliminal suggestions about how bad the economy is, how it is affecting the people who write the news, and how those people deserve some cold hard cash from Uncle Sugar.  Strangely enough, the stories are being written by the same people that are angling for some of that sweet, sweet gummint cheese.  Here are two of them...

Quote
WUSA Moves to One-Person News Crews

Under a new agreement reached this week with its labor unions, WUSA, Channel 9, will become the first station in Washington to replace its crews with one-person "multimedia journalists" who will shoot and edit news stories single-handedly.

The change will blur the distinctions between the station's reporters and its camera and production people. Reporters will soon be shooting and editing their own stories, and camera people will be doing the work of reporters, occasionally appearing on the air or on in video clips on Channel 9's Web site.

For decades, TV journalists have worked in teams, with the lines of responsibility regulated by union rules or simple tradition. Stories were covered by a crew consisting of a camera operator and a correspondent (and further back, by a sound or lighting technician); their work was overseen by a producer and their footage assembled into a finished story by an editor.

(more...)
Quote
Report: Detroit papers likely to cut delivery

DETROIT (AP) -- The Detroit News and Detroit Free Press are leaning toward cutting home delivery to three days a week, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

The Journal, quoting a person on its Web site whom it didn't name, said a final decision has not been made. But the newspaper calls it the "leading scenario."

The papers have separate newsrooms but their business operations are combined under a joint operating agreement.

Leland Bassett, a spokesman for the partnership, would neither confirm nor deny the Journal report but said a news conference was planned for Tuesday.

(more...)

Shameless self-interest, or a genuine cry for help?   :popcorn:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline JohnnyReb

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32063
  • Reputation: +1997/-134
Re: Is the media angling for a bailout of their own?
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2008, 05:57:05 AM »
I've seen a few stories directly addressing a "bailout" for the media.  The rest of them seem to dance around the subject as subliminal suggestions about how bad the economy is, how it is affecting the people who write the news, and how those people deserve some cold hard cash from Uncle Sugar.  Strangely enough, the stories are being written by the same people that are angling for some of that sweet, sweet gummint cheese.  Here are two of them...

Shameless self-interest, or a genuine cry for help?   :popcorn:

Well, the TV stations here have been doing the "one man crew" thing for years and the local paper moved up to tri-weekly from bi-weekly several years ago. .....but then I'm in the union hating south (as per the DUmmies).
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."  Stalin

Offline Jim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Reputation: +55/-6
Re: Is the media angling for a bailout of their own?
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2008, 09:13:57 AM »
They could all go away and the only difference is nothing to wrap fish in.
My fellow Americans, there is nothing audacious about hope. Hope is what makes people buy lottery tickets instead of paying the bills. Hope is for the old gals feeding the slots in Atlantic City. It destroys the inner-city kid who quits school because he hopes he'll be a world-famous recording artist.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?

One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

The other kills her own food.