while I am thrilled that sanity carried the day, I would point out that john paul stevens agreed with the ruling in part, but is one of the justices that will almost certainly be replaced in obama's first term. you can always find a bigger moonbat than the one you are replacing.
the health of dolphins over national security . . . no, wait, the
suspicion that sonar may
displease dolphins nearly trumps national security. you have to worry for your country on this one.
U.S. Supreme Court Lifts Restrictions on Navy Sonar
Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court, ruling that national security trumps environmental rules, lifted restrictions on the Navy's use of sonar during training exercises off the coast of Southern California.
A divided high court rejected arguments by environmentalists that the judge-ordered restrictions were warranted to protect whales and other marine mammals.
The environmental interests ``are plainly outweighed by the Navy's need to conduct realistic training exercises to ensure that it is able to neutralize the threat posed by enemy submarines,'' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
The case tested the power of the White House and the military to skirt federal environmental regulations in the name of national security. The Bush administration argued that courts should be deferential when the president concludes that a military exercise is essential for the country's safety.
Two justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter, dissented, while two others, Stephen Breyer and John Paul Stevens, agreed with Roberts in part.
More