kaput primitive acting like a supermole again, getting primitives' hopes up

[franksolich]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7109258

Oh my.

The ever-prolific kaput primitive, who might, or might not, be another supermole on Skins's island:

kpete  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:47 PM
Original message

Palin Polling-NO Longer An Asset To The Ticket-In Fact-She May Be A Liability   

(ha ha)

Interesting Nate Silver analysis of trends in the presidential race, as the dust settles, including this: "McCain's other problem is that Sarah Palin may no longer be an asset to the ticket; in fact, she may be a liability. Averaging the candidates' favorability scores across four recent polls -- as one should always try and do when looking at favorability numbers since they can vary greatly depending on question wording -- Palin now has the worst net scores among the four principals in the race ...

Palin's average favorability score is now a +7 -- about 10 points behind Joe Biden's numbers. Perhaps more importantly, these numbers are 10-15 points behind where Palin's numbers were just a week or so ago. If voters come in not knowing very much about a candidate -- and the more they see of the candidate, the less they like of the candidate -- this is a major concern."

http://www.warandpiece.com/blogdirs/008064.html
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/09/state-of-race-is...

UPDATE to add:
Latest NYT/CBS Poll: Obama had the support of 48 percent of registered voters, compared with 43 percent for Mr. McCain
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/us/politics/18poll.ht...

There's a chart in the comment too, looking like something the now-mausoleumed tits-in-ass primitive created.

valerief  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message

1. She MAY be a liability?
   
Bwahahahaha!

Libby2  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1

3. I second that!
   
Bwahahahahaaaa

central scrutinizer  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1

12. The Eagleton has landed!

JitterbugPerfume  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message

2. Republicans are attracted to shiny objects but this one tarnished

tblue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2

8. B*sh, Quayle, Reagan.......Their bar, like, REAL LOW.

speedoo  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message

4. Has anything in politics been as predictable than this?
   
My answer is no. Palin was an empty skirt from the get go. Like most RWers, very lacking in judgement and intellect. Just more so.

InternalDialogue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4

9. The Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination ranks up there as well.   

That was like a kiddie-ride rollercoaster at the fair -- no big surprises at how it came out in the end, and it didn't last long.

tblue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message

5. Is there ANYTHING to like about Sarah Palin?

Kurt_and_Hunter  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message

6. Good round-up, but the Daily KOS numbers are kind of obviously junk
   
Including such a dramatic outlier in the table is a GIGO problem.

I haven't ever seen any favorability numbers ANYWHERE that are even close to what Research2000/KOS is putting out there.

Orsino  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message

7. She'd be a nine-day wonder...
   
...if the scandals didn't keep coming.

tblue  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #7

11. Yeah. I WONDER how she lived this long without no heart and no brain.

zidzi  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message

10. Wonder why? Let's ask chuckie todd..is it because of the Economy or "Obama has run a more negative campaign"? Or is it because palin LIES?

I'm confused.

Anybody know if the next vice-president's lied about something?

I must be out of the loop; I haven't heard anything.

This must be the same phenomenon about impeaching George Bush for "crimes," and then the primitives don't tell us what the crimes were, or are.

The Backlash Cometh  Donating Member  (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-18-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message

13. So who won the office lottery?
   
How long did that take?

Ho-hum.

Another day, another rich broad posting from an affluent gated community in sunny southern California.....

[Lord Undies]

Don't like reality?  Mold your own!

With the Ronco Reality Clay!

Order today and receive.....



(molds sold separately)

[DumbAss Tanker]

Echo chamber stuff.  A synopsized repeat of a blogger's analysis, a bad link, and the NYT members-only site.  Meh, I'll settle for real reality.  Limiting her exposure so far has allowed the campaign to build up some suspense and anticipation, and playing a close hand prior to the VP debate is a sound strategy...the McCain campaign has tons of info on every contradictory wackiness Biden has let go with over his career, while Citibank Joe has damned little to work with in preparing to debate Sarah.  Sound tactics.

[miskie]

Palin still matters - but because of the hurricanes and the financial market issues the primitives seem to have learned something - keeping Palin out of the news by any means possible is good. Even if it costs you your job or your freedoms.