Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a federal indictment of the radical leftist, terroristic, extremist Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).On April 21, the DOJ posted on X about the indictment of the SPLC over charges of channeling millions of dollars to people who are part of extremist groups and even white supremacist groups. The latter is particularly ironic, because the woke SPLC loves to hurl accusations of white supremacy and racism at conservatives. But like all leftists, the SPLC radicals are hypocrites. In fact, they shelled out tens of thousands of dollars to multiple members of the Ku Klux Klan.The SPLC has committed 11 counts of wire and bank fraud, based on the federal indictment, as related by CBS News senior White House reporter Jennifer Jacobs. You can see the breakdown of the amounts the SPLC gave out to the various extremist groups below:DOJ X post
This morning the SLPC released a statement about a DOJ investigation into their use of paid informants. It was obvious the SPLC was trying to get ahead of the story, but it turns out they weren't that far ahead. This afternoon FBI Director Kash Patel and Acting AG Todd Blanche announced an 11-count indictment against the SPLC, accusing the group of funding some of the very hate groups they claimed to be fighting.QuoteThe Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted Tuesday on federal fraud charges alleging it improperly raised millions of dollars to pay informants to infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan and other extremist groups, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said.The civil rights group faces charges including wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in the case brought by the Justice Department in Alabama, where the organization is based...Blanche said the SPLC paid at least $3 million between 2014 and 2023 to people affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, the National Socialist Party of America and other extremist groups.Blanche offered a specific example of the funding, saying the SPLC had paid more than a quarter million dollars to one of the organizers of the Unite the Right rally.
The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted Tuesday on federal fraud charges alleging it improperly raised millions of dollars to pay informants to infiltrate the Ku Klux Klan and other extremist groups, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said.The civil rights group faces charges including wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in the case brought by the Justice Department in Alabama, where the organization is based...Blanche said the SPLC paid at least $3 million between 2014 and 2023 to people affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, the National Socialist Party of America and other extremist groups.
Everything the average Democrat believes about America and Republicans is based on a series of hoaxes. The most obvious case, of course, was the Steele Dossier, upon which the decade-long hate campaign against Donald Trump has been based, along with every accusation that he is a tool of Russia....We already knew that the "fine people" hoax was based on the lie that Trump called white supremacists "fine people," instead of, as he did, condemning them. But until yesterday, we didn't know that the white supremacists who marched in Charlottesville and whose protest led to the death of one person were bused there on the Southern Poverty Law Center's dime, and were organized to be there by an SPLC "informer."
A veteran civil rights activist warned Thursday that the Southern Poverty Law Center’s indictment for its alleged informant scheme that secretly bankrolled leaders and members of hate groups is merely “the tip of the iceberg.”Bob Woodson, an 89-year-old civil rights champion who faced jail time for his advocacy in the Jim Crow South, condemned the SPLC and admitted he wasn’t “surprised at all” that the nonprofit allegedly funneled more than $3 million to “field sources” to infiltrate extremists groups between between 2014 and 2023.“This is just a more obvious expression of the contradiction of people who say they are fighting for civil rights, and as a consequence, they are corrupt,” Woodson charged on Fox News’ “The Will Cain Show.”“This is just the tip of the iceberg. These are people who are supposed to be fighting for civil rights.“They ask which problems are fundable, not which ones are solvable. So you get this kind of corruption that you’re witnessing,” the octogenarian declared.
“They ask which problems are fundable, not which ones are solvable. So you get this kind of corruption that you’re witnessing,” the octogenarian declared.
Gavin McInnes@Gavin_McInnesMe yelling at Charlottesville organizer Jason Kessler after “Unite the Right” and accusing him of trying to recruit Proud Boys. (This is in 2017 when “alt-Right” had come to mean full on NatSoc.)
In the early 1990s, I was the opinion pages editor of the Oceanside Blade-Citizen in San Diego County. We were a 30,000 circulation daily serving Oceanside, Carlsbad, Vista and Encinitas. At that time, California and a few other states were pioneering new laws that required financial institutions to share with customers the files they kept on us - and to provide a process for challenging inaccurate information.The editorial board - publisher Tom Missett, managing editor Rusty Harris, and myself - were in favor of this development, and wrote a series of editorials in support of it. Then we went a step further, and in another editorial argued that political and activist organizations that keep files on American citizens should also have to disclose those files on request, and have a process whereby inaccurate information could be challenged.We had in mind everyone from the National Rifle Association to the ACLU - the sorts of nonprofit advocacy groups that tend to monitor what their perceived opponents write and say in public.But it was only the Southern Poverty Law Center we heard from.I have no idea how they knew a mid-size daily in Southern California had written an editorial in favor of transparency and accountability, but they weren't happy. Maybe a reader who disagreed with our position forwarded it to SPLC headquarters halfway across the country, maybe a newspaper near them picked it up off the wire and ran it - it didn't matter.What mattered was that someone from the SPLC called Rusty and warned that this was a dangerous idea. That this would make it more difficult and expensive for them to track white supremacists and racists.Rusty, in his quiet Texas drawl, pointed out that being falsely accused of espousing such views could be devastating to the person so accused - and that surely no reasonable person could oppose allowing people to clear their name?Well, that never happens, they told him.Rusty then suggested they submit a commentary in response to our editorial, and said he's make sure it ran.No, he was told. That isn't good enough. They wanted a retraction of our editorial!Rusty patiently explained that we'd already given this quite a bit of thought, and we stood by our position.Then things turned ugly. It would be unfortunate, the SPLC rep told Rusty, if the SPLC had to add a newspaper of all things to their hate watch list! That they would name our editorial board members as well, let the world know that we supported hate!
