DUmmies Speculate On How They Will Lose

[GOBUCKS]

Conspiracy-minded DUmbasses are speculating on how they will lose. Of course it could only happen through some kind of illegal activity.
They are setting themselves up like a golf ball on a tee.

DUmmy ColbertWatcher (how appropriate) proves he's truly a DUmmy by speculating on the GOP "stealing" states:

ColbertWatcher  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 05:19 PM
Original message
Poll question: In 2000 it was Florida, in 2004 it was Ohio. Which state will the GOP steal in 2008?

Poll result (49 votes) 
Wisconsin  (7 votes, 14%) Vote
Michigan  (18 votes, 37%) Vote
Pennsylvania  (11 votes, 22%) Vote
Nevada  (0 votes, 0%) Vote
Florida  (0 votes, 0%) Vote
Ohio  (3 votes, 6%) Vote
Mississippi  (0 votes, 0%) Vote
Illinois  (0 votes, 0%) Vote
New York  (2 votes, 4%) Vote
Other (please elaborate in reply)  (8 votes, 16%) Vote

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4023167#4023263

ColbertWatcher  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You know, that's my biggest fear: that they'll attack several states ...
 ... and we'll have more people lying to themselves that, "They won't do it again."
Or "Don't think like that!"
They've done it before, no one stopped them; they'll do it again.
It's that simple.

The DUmbest person on all the internets (if Sheila Jackson Lee is offline) chimes in:

sfexpat2000  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm thinking MIchigan. n/t

 
People in the Midwest, trying to run a state primary, have to take a call from a deranged moonbat on the West Coast:

sfexpat2000  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Nothing really solid. But, on primary night, there was a 20 county "glitch"
that counted "Uncommitted" votes as "Write In" and if it weren't for Olbermann, we'd never have known that. It wasn't reported anywhere else. And when I called the SOS office, they lied about what they did about it. First they said they hand counted the votes after they found the problem. After a few minutes, the rep relaxed and told me they hot started those machines. That means, lots of lost votes. Okay. Maybe my tinfoil needs adjusting but if they can do that on primary night, why not on election night?

Another tweaky thing, there have been some stories out of MI about how white blue collar won't vote for Obama and those reports are mostly not sourced to real people.

I just want to watch Michigan. Stressed out people make an easy target.

 
Other DUmmies turn their feeble attention to the mountains:

TheWatcher (1000+ posts)      Wed Sep-17-08 05:36 PM
18. Colorado.
Colorado will be the new Florida/Ohio this year.

Chipper Chat  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 05:44 PM
20. Colorado.
This will be "the final state" that McCain needs to put him at 273.

donco6  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 06:02 PM
26. Several reasons:
One - a Republican Secretary of State who has already faced some electronic voting questions here
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/Feb/22/key-v... /
Two - the state is demonstrably divided politically, so it would be very difficult to prove tampering.
Three - most Dems are in the big cities - the ones with electronic voting - so you can concentrate your efforts with minimal effort/maximum results.

Quickly, DUmmy sfexpat2000, and probably Sheila Jackson Lee, are convinced:

sfexpat2000  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 06:42 PM
32. They will definitely try to screw with CO.
That's another good guess.

 

[Chris_]

That trap door in the MSAccess base code will deliver again.

Don't ask me how I know.

It is quite elegant, though.  Today's IT children couldn't even BEGIN to detect it, much less appreciate its beauty.

I think this year Co will be where we manufacture the "debate" about the count.  Silly little children are so easily distracted by bright shiny objects.

[comradebillyboy]

Obama will likely lose because he is a humorless, self-important, arrogant, superior, self-righteous jerk who's act is beginning to wear thin.

[franksolich]

I dunno.

My prediction is that the Democrat machines will screw with the votes in Boston, Philadelphia, Buffalo, New York City, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Washington D.C., Detroit, Baltimore, Miami, Atlanta, Camden, Jersey City, Newark, Ithaca, Syracuse, Rochester, Charleston, Akron, Youngstown, Toledo, Ann Arbor, Flint, Gary, Chicago, Milwaukee, Madison, Minneapolis, St. Paul, St. Louis, Kansas City, Memphis, Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Denver, Santa Fe, Albuquerque, Phoenix, Lost Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Berkeley, Oakland, Santa Monica, Tiburon, Salem, Eugene, Portland, Seattle, Olympia, &c., &c., &c., &c., &c., &c., &c.

And of course the entire states of New Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maryland, and Washington.

Among others.

[Chris_]

ColbertWatcher  (1000+ posts)       Wed Sep-17-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. You know, that's my biggest fear: that they'll attack several states ...
 ... and we'll have more people lying to themselves that, "They won't do it again."
Or "Don't think like that!"
They've done it before, no one stopped them; they'll do it again.
It's that simple.

I guess we could "attacK' several states with the magic Diebold machine or something, but honestly, I think one of the easiest ways to win would be to put a "no dead folks allowed" sign on the door of every polling place AND enforce that message. Granted, some would consider that disenfranchising the dead; however, I feel that the dead should have more important things to worry about than the government of the living.