Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won"

[FunkyZero]

I thought this deserved it's own thread

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220527249

liberalla (10,620 posts)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 06:58 PM

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won"

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: "The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won"

Math doesn’t lie—people do. A buried NSA‑authorized audit paved the way for this unelected illegitimate regime.

This Will Hold
July 31, 2025

"In December 2024, I was personally involved in an NSA‑authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won—by a wide margin. Trump lost dramatically. There are multiple layers of complexity to this cover‑up, including transnational organized crime syndicates that extend far beyond the United States and our elections. To that point, I work in the human trafficking sector, which intersects with the stolen election(s) and has ties to Trump and Epstein—not to President Biden, Vice President Harris, or Governor Walz, but to the Democrats and other allied interests responsible for burying the audit.” — Adam Zarnowski, ex-CIA agent and author of Jörmungandr*

In an exclusive interview, former CIA operative Adam Zarnowski laid out pieces of an intricate network of bad actors and covert operations behind transnational organized crime and the stolen 2024 election. Some of his disclosures confirmed long‑held suspicions; others were shocking, exposing connections between organized crime, political operatives, and global power brokers.

Adam’s testimony paints one of the clearest—and most disturbing—pictures yet of how the cover‑up was orchestrated and why it has remained buried. His free book Jörmungandr expounds on this testimony, making these intricate networks impossible to ignore.

He explained that none of his revelations are classified; he has full authorization to speak and is prepared to testify under oath. Having personally assisted the NSA in collecting the data, he stressed that a full forensic hand‑count of the 2024 election—beginning with Representative Victoria Spartz—must be this country’s top priority. The completed NSA audit results have been submitted, yet so far have been met with silence.

That silence is not just political inertia—it’s a cover for how the 2024 election was subverted. And at the center of it lies the machinery itself: ES&S, and the quiet installation of their own back door through ECO 1188.

Kid Berwyn (21,560 posts)
2. Explains a lot of why no one around here voted for him.
Reply to liberalla (Original post)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 07:04 PM
Detroit, Ann Arbor...

Dummy: "I'll believe anything you post if I want it to be true."

This thread is a hoot

PatSeg (50,678 posts)
52. And is it possible
Reply to Rver (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 09:32 PM
that we can never have a free and fair election again? In recent years, it feels like there has been overwhelming evidence of election fraud and voter suppression. Yet it only seems to get worse. Unfortunately reasonable solutions are often in the hands of those who are trying to cheat.

Fiendish Thingy (20,221 posts)
9. There is no NSA audit
Reply to DET (Reply #6)
Thu Jul 31, 2025, 08:17 PM
Somebody just made it up for clicks.

RUHT ROH!

[enslaved1]

I'll answer random internet blogger with another random internet blogger....

https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/ex-cia-whistleblower-kamala-harris-2024-election-evidence-30f895

1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, there is extremely limited evidence from any ex-CIA whistleblower regarding Kamala Harris' 2024 election win. Only one source [1] directly addresses the question, citing an individual named Adam Zarnowski, who is identified as an ex-CIA whistleblower. According to this source, Zarnowski claims that an NSA-authorized forensic audit shows Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won the 2024 election "by a wide margin, contradicting the official outcome" [1]. The remaining sources provide no relevant evidence whatsoever. Multiple sources focus on unrelated topics such as Trump's debate performance claims [2], ABC News bias allegations [3], Kash Patel's Senate hearing [4], a 2011 settlement with Quest Diagnostics [5], Emil Bove's court appointment [6], Trump's Ukraine impeachment [7], and Obama-related accusations from 2017 [8].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal significant gaps in verifiable information:

    No verification of Adam Zarnowski's actual CIA credentials or current status
    No details about the methodology or legitimacy of the alleged "NSA-authorized forensic audit" mentioned by Zarnowski [1]
    No independent corroboration of Zarnowski's claims from other intelligence sources
    No discussion of how such claims align with official election results or established vote counting procedures
    Missing publication dates for most sources, making it impossible to assess the timeliness and relevance of the information

The question itself assumes the existence of substantial evidence from an ex-CIA whistleblower, but the analyses suggest this assumption may be unfounded based on the limited and unverified nature of the available information.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Trump won by flipping the swing states and districts he lost in 2020. Those are run by democrats.

[SVPete]

I won't dive into this intellectual sewer pond, but the url for the DU OP claim is https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/ex-cia-whistleblower-the-nsa-audited .

The first BU-Denizen to call BS on the OP claim, was Fiendish Thingy in the 8th Reply to the thread.

[Texacon]

I’ve been watching that thread. It’s brought much amusement!

KC

[ADsOutburst]

Let me see if I have this straight:

-Democrats think Republicans steal Presidential elections with some regularity.

-Democrats for some reason are unable to stop Republicans from stealing elections, or to bring anyone to justice for stealing elections.

-Democrats nevertheless think Republicans are the idiots.

[Zathras]

Let me see if I have this straight:

-Democrats think Republicans steal Presidential elections with some regularity.

-Democrats for some reason are unable to stop Republicans from stealing elections, or to bring anyone to justice for stealing elections.

-Democrats nevertheless think Republicans are the idiots.

Democrats also think it's perfectly fine to replace the candidate who was legally elected as their presidential candidate in the primaries with a usurper who did not get a single vote in those same presidential primaries.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

Democrats also think it's perfectly fine to replace the candidate who was legally elected as their presidential candidate in the primaries with a usurper who did not get a single vote in those same presidential primaries.

Remember when democrats, in complete disregard of the written law, replaced a candidate after the deadline because he was going to lose and cost them control of the Senate?


https://www.foxnews.com/story/new-jersey-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-dems-replacing-torch-on-ballot

TRENTON, N.J. – The New Jersey state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the Democratic Party can replace Sen. Robert Torricelli's name on the November ballot with former Sen. Frank Lautenberg.

The ruling gives hope to Democrats scrambling to retain their one-seat majority in the U.S. Senate through the Nov. 5 election -- but Republicans vowed to appeal the decision to federal court.

...

The fight over which Democrat will appear on the Nov. 5 ballot erupted Monday after Torricelli dropped his faltering re-election campaign amid lingering questions about his ethics. He was admonished over the summer by a Senate committee for allegedly taking lavish campaign gifts from a contributor to his 1996 campaign.