Author Topic: McCain Responds to Obama's Reported Undermining of Cmdr in Chief During wartime  (Read 2119 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
The McCain Campaign has issued a statement responding to the report from Amer Taheri (see today's web briefing) that Sen. Obama secretly negotiated with the Iraqi government regarding U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.  McCain spokesman Randy Scheunemann stated as follows:

At this point, it is not yet clear what official American negotiations Senator Obama tried to undermine with Iraqi leaders, but the possibility of such actions is unprecedented.  It should be concerning to all that he reportedly urged that the democratically-elected Iraqi government listen to him rather than the US administration in power.  If news reports are accurate, this is an egregious act of political interference by a presidential candidate seeking political advantage overseas.  Senator Obama needs to reveal what he said to Iraq's Foreign Minister during their closed door meeting.    The charge that he sought to delay the withdrawal of Americans from Iraq raises serious questions about Senator Obama's judgment and it demands an explanation.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmRmMDAwNDc1ZTMxMDAzNGJlYjA5NWY1MzRlMGJmM2M

The article -
http://www.nypost.com/seven/09152008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obama_tried_to_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_129150.htm

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.

Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.

While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.


« Last Edit: September 15, 2008, 07:52:20 PM by DixieBelle »
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle

Offline Jim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Reputation: +55/-6
the kid has some 'splainin to do and he better come clean or its the slammer
My fellow Americans, there is nothing audacious about hope. Hope is what makes people buy lottery tickets instead of paying the bills. Hope is for the old gals feeding the slots in Atlantic City. It destroys the inner-city kid who quits school because he hopes he'll be a world-famous recording artist.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?

One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

The other kills her own food.

Offline lizard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
  • Reputation: +28/-1
Is the Omessiah guilty of violating The Logan Act?   :fuelfire:

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
October Surprise in September?  Could we be looking at a mrs. clinton/biden ticket?
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Jim

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Reputation: +55/-6
October Surprise in September?  Could we be looking at a mrs. clinton/biden ticket?





nah, let them screw around with this for a month or so to make it impossible to roll back the loser.
My fellow Americans, there is nothing audacious about hope. Hope is what makes people buy lottery tickets instead of paying the bills. Hope is for the old gals feeding the slots in Atlantic City. It destroys the inner-city kid who quits school because he hopes he'll be a world-famous recording artist.

What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?

One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

The other kills her own food.

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
October Surprise in September?  Could we be looking at a mrs. clinton/biden ticket?


Id have to say no - It is probably a ticket w/Obama at the top regardless, and <<if>> they won, Biden would immediately be sworn in as POTUS, with the Speaker of the House ascending to VEEP. Unless Obama dumps Biden now and installs Hillary in his place. I could be wrong on this, but honestly, I can think of no examples where a Presidential nominee is removed from a ticket for treason.

Seriously, what are the odds of this ticket claiming victory if there is any truth to this story ? 3, maybe 4% ? Hillary would do best to let it sink. 

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
October Surprise in September?  Could we be looking at a mrs. clinton/biden ticket?


Id have to say no - It is probably a ticket w/Obama at the top regardless, and <<if>> they won, Biden would immediately be sworn in as POTUS, with the Speaker of the House ascending to VEEP. Unless Obama dumps Biden now and installs Hillary in his place. I could be wrong on this, but honestly, I can think of no examples where a Presidential nominee is removed from a ticket for treason.

Seriously, what are the odds of this ticket claiming victory if there is any truth to this story ? 3, maybe 4% ? Hillary would do best to let it sink. 

There hasn't been a candidate who has been found out comitting treason (Nixon did not and even so, any accusations were much after his election).

In case you haven't noticed, there ain't been NUTHIN like this election before.  Not even close.


Anything is possible -- and probable.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.