Author Topic: Epstein was second in command  (Read 174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6170
  • Reputation: +1760/-29
Epstein was second in command
« on: July 16, 2025, 08:22:28 AM »
Quote
kentuck

Epstein was second in command...


He had the location, his own island, to work from. He had the money. He had connections. He had the one connection that mattered - Donald Trump.

Because Epstein was not the "recruiter". He did not have access to international "teen pageants" or beauty contests. But his biggest connection had access to them all. He knew all the beautiful girls all around the world. From Moscow to Moldova, he found the girls that Epstein wanted.

But, he was not the type to work for nothing. He got a cut. And he got his choice of which girls he wanted. That was the reward of the "recruiter".

And he knew all the big shots in New York and Florida and all points in between. He promised them all a good time, on an island, away from all the tabloids and gossip. Many accepted his "invitation". It was his claim to fame.

That's the way I see it.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220486048

Uh huh 🥱 suddenly you give a crapp

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5416
  • Reputation: +1038/-31
  • Democracy can survive anything except Democrats
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2025, 08:39:09 AM »
If Trump had that much involvement, I'm pretty sure that we would have found out when the Biden administration had control of the information. Unless... Biden had some responsibility too.
"My enemy's enemy is the enemy I kill last."
Klingon Proverb.

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19524
  • Reputation: +2565/-49
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2025, 08:39:45 AM »
My God, you are insane, PC Janitor. Which has been proven over and over again.

Bill Clinton and his underlings were the connection he needed, not President Trump.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29519
  • Reputation: +3274/-248
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2025, 08:55:59 AM »


kt's Trump-Hate has progressed from Trump was one of Epstein's customers to Trump was Epstein's "commander"? kt's explanation for why LIEden protected Trump from exposure for 4 years must be jaw-droppingly hilarious!
« Last Edit: July 16, 2025, 08:58:15 AM by SVPete »
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline Tess Anderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4201
  • Reputation: +2890/-31
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2025, 10:39:31 AM »


kentuck is incredibly  stupid, his TDS is off the charts.  :mental:

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19524
  • Reputation: +2565/-49
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2025, 11:03:11 AM »
My God, you are insane, PC Janitor. Which has been proven over and over again.

Bill Clinton and his underlings were the connection he needed, not President Trump.

Oh my. I read that screed and assumed it was from PJ Janitor and it was Ken-****. Their madness is almost impossible to distinguish from.

Mea culpa. Guess I wasn't fully caffeinated.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6170
  • Reputation: +1760/-29
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2025, 11:54:06 AM »


kentuck is incredibly  stupid, his TDS is off the charts.  :mental:
WTF, he looks scary

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23590
  • Reputation: +2500/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2025, 12:12:00 PM »
How long until we are told the Russian collusion hoax was a distraction from the real scandal?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29519
  • Reputation: +3274/-248
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2025, 12:21:41 PM »
How long until we are told the Russian collusion hoax was a distraction from the real scandal?

Some 70% of Dems still bitterly cling ( :-) ) to their Trump-Russia Collusion Delusion, so I doubt that will happen any time soon.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5245
  • Reputation: +1609/-13
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2025, 01:23:26 PM »
Is "something, something, Epstein!!!" the next recurring, incoherent Democratic Party conspiracy theory?

Online 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6487
  • Reputation: +1727/-41
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2025, 02:43:17 PM »
WTF, he looks scary

You gots a purdy looking mouth son.
NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19524
  • Reputation: +2565/-49
Re: Epstein was second in command
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2025, 04:33:57 PM »
You gots a purdy looking mouth son.

A possible extra who was shunned for being too ugly to be in background scenes in "Deliverance".
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender