VIDEO: CNN Cut 60% of Interview as DEMANDED by Team Kamala

[pjcomix]

Did the CNN interview seem short to you? That was because only 18 minutes of the 45 minute interview was shown on "live" (as CNN lied) TV. IOW, SIXTY PERCENT of the entire interview was cut out at because Kamala and her team demanded it. And being the DNC lackeys that they are, CNN fully complied with that request. Can anybody out there, in their wildest imagination, think that CNN would comply with such a request by say Donald Trump or JD Vance? Of course not. A lot of people are now requesting the transcript of the FULL interview. That is NOT good enough because who can trust CNN to provide an accurate transcript? They MUST release the ENTIRE video of the interview. The 18 minutes of the Kamala interview was pretty disastrous so imagine what the video from the SIXTY PERCENT of the interview we did NOT see must be like.

Nobody from the Trump campaign and Team MAGA should make an appearance on CNN for the rest of this campaign season without DEMANDING that CNN release the video of the FULL 45 minutes interview.

https://rumble.com/v5d4lt1-cnn-cut-60-of-interview-as-demanded-by-team-kamala.html

[ADsOutburst]

I figured they would leave out parts that were unflattering, but even I'm surprised it was only 18 minutes.

[SVPete]

Is there a non-annoymorous source for this?

[Old n Grumpy]

I figured they would leave out parts that were unflattering, but even I'm surprised it was only 18 minutes.

Me thinks the whole thing wasn’t flattering. It was an unmitigated disaster with a capital D.

She looked small and like she just wanted to melt away. Maybe the first few minutes destroyed her like Trump did to biden at the beginning of the debate.

We really don’t need proof that she’s a loser we’re already aware of it from the last 31/2 years.

[Ralph Wiggum]

Is there a non-annoymorous source for this?

That is always the issue when a pre-recorded interview takes place, that the network or station never actually discloses (nor do they have to) how long the interview lasted. And if those were only the good parts, holy crap I'd love to see what gibberish was left on the proverbial cutting room floor.

[pjcomix]

Is there a non-annoymorous source for this?

How about our own lyin' eyes that told us only 18 minutes of interview used in a highly padded hour show? Watch  the interview again and then hit the timer on your cell phone whenever they are interviewing and click it off when the interviewing stops. Then add up  the segments.

[Ralph Wiggum]

How about our own lyin' eyes that told us only 18 minutes of interview used in a highly padded hour show? Watch  the interview again and then hit the timer on your cell phone whenever they are interviewing and click it off when the interviewing stops. Then add up  the segments.

Hot off the presses from an honest journalist who used to work for Fox News and was fired from CBS for not revealing her sources earlier this year:

Catherine Herridge Asks If CNN Will Commit a Flagrant Act of Journalism and Release Full Kamala Interview

Amy Curtis
 |
6:00 PM on August 31, 2024


Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
Given the political stakes….

Will
@CNN
 follow ProPublica’s lead and release the full, unedited video interview and transcript with Harris and Walz?

It’s about transparency, adding new reporting to the public discussion and journalists standing behind their final interview edit.

What we saw of the interview didn't look good for Kamala, and that's saying something.

More here:

https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/08/31/catherine-herridge-asks-if-cnn-will-commit-a-flagrant-act-of-journalism-and-release-full-kamala-interview-n2400363

[SVPete]

My simple question was simply the question I asked. It did not insinuate anything about the accuracy of the OP. I've been in the place of the DUmmie in this thread, https://conservativecave.com/cave/index.php?topic=134828.0 , making a bold claim that turned out to be untrue or significantly exaggerated. As I implied in that thread, I've seen bold claims and gotchas from both sides of the political fence that turned out to be untrue, exaggerated, or troll-sourced.

If my not wanting to have egg on my face offends, well, I'm not going to apologize.

[BamaMoose]

I am surprised that none of the media outlets have jumped on the fact that, during the entire interview, CNN's chyron showed "Live" and "Breaking News" giving the false impression that the interview was not pre-recorded.  Dana Bash did note that it was recorded earlier in the day at the very beginning of the show and CNN did release bits and pieces of it during the day, but it was still misleading.  We'll probably never know how much, if any, editing was done, but it certainly wasn't the spontaneous, contemporaneous interview that everyone was expecting.  And it was extremely short.  With both Harris and Walz there, I expected they would fill up the hour.  When Bash ended the interview, I was kind of shocked that the best they could put together was 20ish minutes of softball questions and soft, squishy responses.  With all the buildup I figured they would at least try to deliver a decent interview.  But it didn't even deliver any worthwhile soundbites for either campaign.

[Ralph Wiggum]

I am surprised that none of the media outlets have jumped on the fact that, during the entire interview, CNN's chyron showed "Live" and "Breaking News" giving the false impression that the interview was not pre-recorded.  Dana Bash did note that it was recorded earlier in the day at the very beginning of the show and CNN did release bits and pieces of it during the day, but it was still misleading.  We'll probably never know how much, if any, editing was done, but it certainly wasn't the spontaneous, contemporaneous interview that everyone was expecting.  And it was extremely short.  With both Harris and Walz there, I expected they would fill up the hour.  When Bash ended the interview, I was kind of shocked that the best they could put together was 20ish minutes of softball questions and soft, squishy responses.  With all the buildup I figured they would at least try to deliver a decent interview.  But it didn't even deliver any worthwhile soundbites for either campaign.

Media companies assume most of their viewers are stupid and won't know the difference. After all, at least half of the country has an IQ below average.

[jukin]

This is what the Founders intended Freedom of the Press to beall about, being told what to do by powerful  political and government forces and buckling under. This is "precious" democracy!

[SVPete]

Hot off the presses from an honest journalist who used to work for Fox News and was fired from CBS for not revealing her sources earlier this year:

Catherine Herridge Asks If CNN Will Commit a Flagrant Act of Journalism and Release Full Kamala Interview
...

Whether 60% or 6% of the "interview" is on the editing room floor (I believe some did, but I won't post a number that implies actual knowledge and some degree of exactness), my expectation is that CNN will not.