Author Topic: Rachel Maddow and Her Co-Stars Made 'Verifiably False' Statements About a Doctor  (Read 3274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29222
  • Reputation: +3202/-248
Rachel Maddow and Her Co-Stars Made 'Verifiably False' Statements About a Doctor They Called the 'Uterus Collector.' Now His $30 Million Lawsuit Is Headed For Trial.

https://freebeacon.com/media/rachel-maddow-and-her-co-stars-made-verifiably-false-statements-about-a-doctor-they-called-the-uterus-collector-now-his-30-million-lawsuit-is-headed-for-trial/

Quote
NBCUniversal is headed for trial after a judge ruled in favor of a Georgia doctor who MSNBC’s biggest stars accused of performing "mass hysterectomies" on women at a Trump-era immigration facility in Georgia. The judge ruled that Rachel Maddow, Nicolle Wallace, and Chris Hayes made "verifiably false" statements about the doctor, who is suing NBC for $30 million.

The discovery process in the lawsuit, which has received little attention, has drawn back the curtain on the inner workings of MSNBC, revealing how the liberal cable network works hand in hand with NBC News, which seeks to portray itself as nonpartisan. NBCUniversal’s standards department reviewed and approved the reporting on the Georgia doctor, before it was published on NBCNews.com and then broadcast on MSNBC programs. The NBC News correspondents, Jacob Soboroff and Julia Ainsley, worked closely with a standards executive during their reporting. Soboroff is also an MSNBC correspondent.
...
In her ruling last month, the judge, Lisa Godbey Wood of the Southern District of Georgia,  found that Maddow, Hayes, and Wallace made 39 "verifiably false" allegations about Mahendra Amin, a gynecologist who treated detainees at a Georgia Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility.
...
"In the end, we are left with this: NBC investigated the whistleblower letter's accusations; that investigation did not corroborate the accusations and even undermined some; NBC republished the letter's accusations anyway," Wood wrote in a scathing 108-page ruling on June 26. She ordered a jury trial to determine if MSNBC engaged in "actual malice," the standard to determine defamation.

 :ohmy:

Unlike Trump or some national-level pol, MesSNBC cannot use the public figure defense, which forces on plaintiffs a higher burden of proof.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline Old n Grumpy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9589
  • Reputation: +2115/-13
It’s time some of the talking heads need to be sued into oblivion to stop this madness.
Life is tough and it’s even tougher when you’re stupid

Basking in the glow of my white Privilege and toxic masculinity while I water the Begonias with liberal tears!

I will give up my guns when the liberals give up their illegal aliens

We need a Bull Shit tax to make the Democrats go broke!

Offline FreeBorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
  • Reputation: +257/-45
  • Semper Fidelis
Hear hear!


"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin; And how do you tell an anti-communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." ~Ronald Reagan