Tue Jul 4, 2023, 01:35 PM
superpatriotman (6,114 posts)
Cocaine reportedly found at White House
...
The Associated Press, citing two officials who were unauthorized to speak about the investigation, later on Tuesday reported that the white powder was found “in an area accessible to tour groups[/[/b][/color]quote]
Annoymorous Sources! How would the MSM serve their Dem owner-masters without Annoymorous Sources?!
Meanwhile, back in the real world:
So we still don't know who brought the cocaine into the White House?https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2023/07/05/so-we-still-dont-know-who-brought-the-cocaine-into-the-white-house-n562459One of the crazier stories to show up this week (and the competition was fierce) involved a bag of cocaine being found at the White House. For one thing, the story kept changing on a daily basis. It was initially reported that the drugs were found “near” the White House. Later, the WaPo reported that it was found in the White House library, which would have placed it inside the executive mansion. But as the nation celebrated America’s birthday, the tale changed yet again. The Secret Service contradicted the library story, saying that the baggie of coke was not in the library. It was found “in a work area in the West Wing.” The location was described as being “in a storage facility in a cubby routinely used by White House staff and guests to store cellphones.” This would be a very interesting development indeed, particularly since it would limit the possible list of suspects significantly, making a potential investigation easier. Here is more from Redstate.
1. Tourists seldom or never go to the West Wing.
2. Staff guests would probably go through security.
3. Staff or WH residents are the most likely suspects to have brought in the cocaine, and if staff go through security to enter ...
So, yeah, bring on the security cameras, and fingerprint the bag (if the morons who found and handled it didn't screw up any latent fingerprints). Will silence tell the tale?
