Yeah, I heard someone make a snide remark how Bristol's sex life should be no more private than Bill Clinton's..... Excuse me, but Bill Clinton was the subject of a sexual harassment suit when the Monica Lewinsky story broke. Can people really be that stupid?
That's completely wrong. Bristol isn't running for office. Period. Her "sex life" is off limits.
as brilliant as you are, sometimes I think that you are intentionally ignoring the point, Mia.
the accusation from the left is hypocrisy. since we are pro-life, and since the only alternative to "****ing whenever" that they
will recognize is abstinence, the left thinks that they have Sarah Palin nailed for the only sin that they will recognize; hypocrisy.
her daughter is pregnant. she did not abstain. therefore, Sarah is a hypocrite.
Of course I'm ignoring the bigger picture.
I understand what the "left" is saying and I get what the "right" is saying.
I personally feel that Bristol being pregnant has zero impact on how I feel about Sarah Palin as VP. I dislike her*, but the fact that her daughter's pregnant has no bearing on it.
*Yes, of course, I'm not a fan of Sarah Palin, but there's no need to go into a lengthy discussion about it. I've stay away from the Palin threads before and I don't want this to disenvolve into an "educating" Miss Mia about Palin thread.
