Author Topic: Republican president, house, and senate would greatly restrict abortion  (Read 1286 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12574
  • Reputation: +1728/-1068
  • Remember
Quote
867-5309. (127 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216665810

A Republican president, house, and senate would greatly restrict abortion nationwide
There's talk of codifying abortion rights into law. That's crucial.

But let's realize a Republican president, house, and senate won't be content to leave it to the states. They will legislate anti-choice laws nationwide. Their talk of letting it reside with the states is crap.

 :whatever:

Quote
Star Member mucifer (20,981 posts)

1. If the economy continues to weaken and people struggle more to have food, gas, and housing

abortion will not be a priority. Blame will go to the democrats and not the repubs, manchin and sinema.

Quote
Star Member Vogon_Glory (8,384 posts)

2. Republican politicians are the anti-abortion fanatics' b**tches

The anti-abortion fanatics OWN them. Pro-choice politicians have been run out of the Tepublican Party or have been reduced to being useful idiots for the reactionaries’ social and political agendas.

A Republican politician on the make who says. He or she is pro-choice is LYING. They HAVE to lie. If they act pro-choice, the reactionaries will primary them and their political aspirations end right then and there.

We’ve all seen it, and those who deny it are hopelessly clueless or lying through their teeth.

Quote
Lovie777 (3,785 posts)

5. For thee, yes . ..

GQP - for me, nope.

 :yawn:
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29275
  • Reputation: +3215/-248
Quote
867-5309. (127 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216665810

A Republican president, house, and senate would greatly restrict abortion nationwide
There's talk of codifying abortion rights into law. That's crucial.

But let's realize a Republican president, house, and senate won't be content to leave it to the states. They will legislate anti-choice laws nationwide. Their talk of letting it reside with the states is crap.

1. No, they could not. Because if Roe is overturned, that takes regulating abortion out of Federal jurisdiction.

2. The Roe decision usurped states' authority to regulate abortion. Overturning Roe undoes that usurpation, and states would again be able to regulate (or not) abortion.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline Drafe Hoblin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1976
  • Reputation: +461/-13
127-posts and has no concept of States' Rights. 

The States will vote however they want.  What's there to whine about?

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Sorry DUmbasses, I'm not a member of convention of the states groups because I give a shit about what you do in California. Quite the opposite.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • Reputation: +2542/-49
Clearly the leftist talking points have emerged with the usual tremendous hyperbole. Could Republicans ban LGBTQ&IA2X children and adults? Banning contraception or interracial marriage are also their other favorite extrapolations based on absolutely nothing but supposition.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16208
  • Reputation: +2100/-170
1. No, they could not. Because if Roe is overturned, that takes regulating abortion out of Federal jurisdiction.

2. The Roe decision usurped states' authority to regulate abortion. Overturning Roe undoes that usurpation, and states would again be able to regulate (or not) abortion.

Beat me to it. The Constitutional lawyers at the DUmp really have a grip on the ruling.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29275
  • Reputation: +3215/-248
Beat me to it. The Constitutional lawyers at the DUmp really have a grip on the ruling.

If only they had the legal wisdom of laserhaas to help them! :rotf:
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline enslaved1

  • If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2128
  • Reputation: +781/-4
127-posts and has no concept of States' Rights. 

The States will vote however they want.  What's there to whine about?

Like everything else in moonbat/proggie land, state's rights only matter if they help the current thing.  They are all for state's rights to legalize weed, or ignore immigration laws, or infringe on the 2nd amendment, but if the state's might go against the hive mind, then they default back to almighty federal government deciding everything. 

I think that is much of why there has been little to no effort to actually make fed legislation on abortion since RvW.  Number one, the progs could just say they didn't need to, RvW was accepted as legalizing abortion.  Two, even many proggies don't want to actually sign their name on the dotted line, either for political or personal reasons, affirming on paper that they support killing babies.  They will happily say they support "choice" in campaign talk and in indirect funding and non-binding resolutions.
Romans 6:17-18 But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness.