Author Topic: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress  (Read 1279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13052
  • Reputation: +1670/-55
  • All The Way!
Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« on: December 15, 2021, 02:04:33 PM »
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216147828


Oh wow!  Check out THIS thread!!


Quote
WarGamer (3,216 posts)


Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress

https://www.businessinsider.com/we-are-free-market-economy-pelosi-rejects-stock-ban-congress-2021-12

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday rejected the idea of banning members of Congress and their spouses from holding and trading individual stocks while in office.

"This is a free market, and people — we are a free market economy. They should be able to participate in that," Pelosi said when asked by Insider at her weekly press conference.

Insider also asked Pelosi about "Conflicted Congress," a 5-month-long investigation by Insider that found 49 members of Congress and 182 senior congressional staffers have violated the STOCK Act, a law to prevent Insider trading.






Wow.

Discuss?

Related story:

https://www.npr.org/2021/09/21/1039313011/tiktokers-are-trading-stocks-by-watching-what-members-of-congress-do

Among a certain community of individual investors on TikTok, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading disclosures are a treasure trove. "Shouts out to Nancy Pelosi, the stock market's biggest whale," said user 'ceowatchlist.' Another said, "I've come to the conclusion that Nancy Pelosi is a psychic," while adding that she is the "queen of investing."

"She knew," declared Chris Josephs, analyzing a particular trade in Pelosi's financial disclosures. "And you would have known if you had followed her portfolio."

Last year, Josephs noticed that the trades, actually made by Pelosi's investor husband and merely disclosed by the speaker, were performing well.

Josephs is the co-founder of a company called Iris, which shows other people's stock trades. In the past year and a half, he has been taking advantage of a law called the Stock Act, which requires lawmakers to disclose stock trades and those of their spouses within 45 days.
5

   

Quote
WhiskeyGrinder (14,754 posts)

1. Lol.

Quote
Autumn (40,986 posts)

4. "This is a free market and a free market economy". Right... and it's rigged for politicians

But not for the lower classes amirite?

Quote
WhiskeyGrinder (14,754 posts)

5. It's a club, and we're not in it.

Quote
Autumn (40,986 posts)

6. That's become loud and clear.

Quote
BComplex (5,923 posts)

2. Well THAT sucks!

Quote
Wounded Bear (47,690 posts)

3. Disappointing...nt

Quote
BlueIdaho (10,105 posts)

7. Not a good look for Democrats.

It goes along with the seeming ease of ignoring the filibuster when it’s suits all our politicians. I know there is no filibuster in the House, but Senators have the same sort of flexible morals when it comes to legislation in their body. Pay the bills? Fine and dandy - ignore the filibuster. Protect the votings rights of all Americans - suddenly the filibuster is sacred.

This shit makes Democrats look like hypocrites.


Looks like hypocrites?  Looks like?!   :lmao:


Quote
WarGamer (3,216 posts)

12. Read yesterday...

Some Members who sit on the Defense Committees hold stock in Defense contractors...

Quote
jimfields33 (8,313 posts)

16. It doesn't surprise me at all

She’s heavily invested in stocks through her husband. I do believe she’s mainly hands off for obvious reasons.

Quote
Spider Jerusalem (21,431 posts)

11. That is a fantastically stupid statement (n/t)

Quote
WhiskeyGrinder (14,754 posts)

13. Go girlboss qween!11!1!!!!!!11!!!!!

Quote
PTWB (3,122 posts)

14. She should have come up with a better line of reasoning.

Insider trading is insider trading. I’m disappointed with Nancy Pelosi and that is a very rare occurrence. We can do better. We must do better.

Quote
leftstreet (33,782 posts)

24. How can she not acknowledge the insider trading issue here?

What a horrible Marie Antoinette response from her

Quote
superpatriotman (5,741 posts)

25. Unacceptable

Free markets do not have political fingers on the scales.


'Nuff said.

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16225
  • Reputation: +2108/-170
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2021, 02:17:26 PM »
If that doesn't demonstrate that Nanzi Palsi is an evil senile corrupt alcoholic, what does?
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2021, 02:25:26 PM »
This is a minor distraction to be swept under the rug in short order. There's a narrative, and this quote from Nancy doesn't fit that narrative. Give them a half a second and they'll be back to claiming that Pelosi and Co. are always looking out for the best interests of all Americans and they'll attribute this quote to some Republican.

What's the chances the documented alcoholic NanceGreggs does a rant on this topic? Zero.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5210
  • Reputation: +1590/-13
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2021, 02:26:16 PM »
Looks like hypocrites?  Looks like?!   :lmao:

Republicans pounce in 3... 2... 1...

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2021, 02:44:15 PM »
And here come the zombies to circle the wagons.

Quote from:
BannonsLiver

33. The first 4-5 responses make me support her.

Quote from:
Kingofalldems

35. Wow my foot.

I say wow to the last paragraph which is a full blown attack on Nancy Pelosi with zero evidence presented.

Quote from:
Torchlight

37. Things have been looking pretty bad for the GOP this week.

So I'm not too surprised this sort of thing would show up.

.
« Last Edit: December 15, 2021, 02:46:20 PM by USA4ME »
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline Texacon

  • Super
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13052
  • Reputation: +1670/-55
  • All The Way!
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2021, 03:02:49 PM »
And here come the zombies to circle the wagons.

.


 :rofl:

KC
  Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.  Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.

*Stolen

Offline FlaGator

  • Another Pilgrim
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5412
  • Reputation: +1032/-31
  • Democracy can survive anything except Democrats
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2021, 06:31:39 PM »
Insider trading for we but not for thee.
"My enemy's enemy is the enemy I kill last."
Klingon Proverb.

Offline Drafe Hoblin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1976
  • Reputation: +461/-13
Re: Pelosi rejects stock-trading ban for members of Congress
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2021, 10:02:48 PM »
That was the fastest answer to a question ever recorded.

" Will you ban Representatives from stock-trans " NO. " actions... ? "