http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6751235Oh my.
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:27 PM
Original message
Caroline Kennedy telling Wolf to **** off...
"No I'm not going to walk you thru that process", "Boy, you know a lot about the process" (said kind of sarcastically). Love it!
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. You know something? I'm getting mighty damned sick and tired of everyone having to worry about what HRC's supporters will think about such and such, as if they have special entitlements or something. The only reason Wolfie asked such questions was to keep the whole thing all stirred up; in fact, that's what many in the MSM are trying to do. She handled it very well, letting him know she wasn't going to fall for it and play into their hands.
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Since when is it required that a nominee vet a particular VP possibility? Why should she and/or her supporters have felt entitled to a vetting? Why should he have to explain why he didn't vet her or any other VP candidate? Their sense of entitlement is truly breathtaking. I thought she handled it perfectly and I have a major problem with how the MSM is trying to stir this up every single damned chance they get. Everything's all about why Hillary wasn't vetted, why he chose Biden instead of Hillary, and aren't her supporters full of anger and lingering resentment, yaddayadda, blahblahblah. I cringed when I saw Wolfie as one of the "reporters", he's nothing more than a RW tool.
Since Lisa's not a primitive, one assumes the last sentence in her comment was tongue-in-cheek.
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Then you must have been watching in a parallel universe, since she was anything but arrogant. What WAS arrogant was Wolfie having the gall to demand to know why Hillary wasn't vetted, and to demand the particulars of a quite private process. And he damned well knew that, he just wanted to stir it up and keep it stirred.
Bonus: we also get the sparkling husband primitive, whose wife makes him use the bathroom in the basement:
Husb2Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. "And by the way Wolf, go **** off." ......
..... and then smile sweetly.
And then back to Lisa, who's being facetious:
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-25-08 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. She's probably pissed at the way the MSM is continually trying to stir the whole Hillary thing up and create and maintain controversy. It is mighty infuriating.
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Tue Aug-26-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #34
90. Wolfie is, indeed, a shit-stirrer and tool of the highest magnitude. I'll never forget him right after Katrina, when he was interviewing an Army Corp of Engineers Corpman about the New Orleans levees. The corpman was talking about how the funding for the maintenance of the levees had been too low for years. Wolfie asked him point-blank, "so, who's to blame for this, Clinton?" I could NOT believe it and I think the corpman seemed a little taken aback, as well. At this point, he might as well just have a giant RW Whore sign on his forehead.
Oh my. I used to watch Wolf Blitzer during the early 1990s; at the time, he struck me as being somewhat to the left of.....Walter Ulbricht.
