Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kentuck (95,853 posts) Just count the paper ballots... Make a record of it.Call in the results.Put them in the computer.How difficult can that be?Stop the horsetrading. It makes it impossible to get an accurate count. If only 3 or 4 people show up for a candidate, give him credit for those, even if it doesn't equal the 15% or whatever is required. When it is all totaled up, there would be a more accurate record.But when one group can persuade a smaller group to vote with them, that doesn't create an accurate picture, in my opinion.https://www.democraticunderground.com/1287472160
In multiple precincts, callers said, caucus chairs did not know how to calculate the final math...
Bwahahahahaha!https://twitter.com/DavidWright_7/status/1224561796121534465
The Democrat Iowa caucuses literally could not have gone worse. I woke up at 7 a.m. ET on Tuesday still expecting to see some results, and yet there were none. President Trump responded to the catastrophe that was the Iowa caucuses Tuesday morning. “The Democrat Caucus is an unmitigated disaster,” he tweeted. ......“The only person that can claim a very big victory in Iowa last night is ‘Trump’,” the president added.
kentuck (95,853 posts) Just count the paper ballots... Make a record of it.Call in the results.Put them in the computer.How difficult can that be?Stop the horsetrading. It makes it impossible to get an accurate count. If only 3 or 4 people show up for a candidate, give him credit for those, even if it doesn't equal the 15% or whatever is required. When it is all totaled up, there would be a more accurate record.But when one group can persuade a smaller group to vote with them, that doesn't create an accurate picture, in my opinion.
kentuck (95,853 posts) Just count the paper ballots... Make a record of it.Call in the results.Put them in the computer.How difficult can that be?