Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Progressive Law (149 posts)Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"? For example, society doesn't associate illegal drug users with drug trafficking. I'm just looking for opinions, not trying to undermine the issue of human trafficking. https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100211856552
Progressive Law (149 posts)Is it fair to associate "Johns" as "human/sex traffickers"?
Response to Blue_true (Reply #165)Sun Feb 24, 2019, 09:32 PMStar Member EffieBlack (13,248 posts) 175. The vast majority of John's fall into the first two categories - and a couple categoriesyou left out. I'm not willing to give a pass to the first two kinds or the others - or ignore the humanity and suffering of the women and involved whom you didn't mention - in order to protect the men who want to pay hundreds and thousands of dollars for "consensual" sex. And, FYI, my experience working with trafficked women taught me that men who pay big money for a prostitute aren't paying for sex - since men with means rarely have any trouble finding wonen to have sex with them for free. They are paying for temporary ownership of a woman whose agency they have taken away and whom they can subjugate and control (even if they're not engaging in physical violence).