Since she's used these as sort-of corroboration of her utterly uncorroborated story, they are relevant and should be seen first-hand. The medical records privacy thingy is a smokescreen. Besides just a cause of delay. I think what she's trying to keep hidden is that her story has evolved: originally she said mid 80s and now claims 1982. IOW inconsistency. As for the polygraph record, it is likely to show that it was pretty cursory - crafted so she could avoid committing to anything specific - and expose her little scared rabbit testimony about the procedure as a lie.