Judicial Watch Warns 11 States to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face ...

[mrclose]

Judicial Watch Warns 11 States to Clean Voter Registration Lists or Face Federal Lawsuit

It's a start! 

(Washington, DC) — Judicial Watch today announced it has sent notice-of-violation letters threatening to sue 11 states having counties in which the number of registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens, as calculated by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey. According to the letters, this is “strong circumstantial evidence that these … counties are not conducting reasonable voter registration record maintenance as mandated under the [National Voter Registration Act] NVRA.”  Both the NVRA and the federal Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls.

The 11 states are: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and Tennessee.  The states have 90 days after receiving the letters to address the problem and provide Judicial Watch documentation showing that they have conducted a “statewide effort to conduct a program that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.” Judicial Watch informed the states that should they fail to take action to correct violations of Section 8 of the NVRA, it would file suit.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-warns-11-states-clean-voter-registration-lists-face-federal-lawsuit/

[franksolich]

Whoa.  Hold on.  Wait a minute.

How come California and Washington aren't on that list?

[SVPete]

Whoa.  Hold on.  Wait a minute.

How come California and Washington aren't on that list?

I think in this lawsuit Judicial Watch going after the lowest hanging fruit:

... 11 states having counties in which the number of registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens ...

It's going to be very difficult for these states to dispute, in court that there are significant problems in those counties. Even the race-baiters will have trouble putting across their "voter suppression" narrative - they'll Play that Race Card, but as soon as this easily understood statistical disparity is pointed out, the narrative will die in a flurry of accusations of racism.

The other side of this coin is that winning this lawsuit will undermine the Ds' whole denial narrative, and the longer they protract this lawsuit, the more publicity and credibility it gets.

[SVPete]

BTW, another low-hanging-fruit situation might be cities/regions in which the number of votes cast significantly exceed the number of registered voters in a large number of precincts.

[Old n Grumpy]

BTW, another low-hanging-fruit situation might be cities/regions in which the number of votes cast significantly exceed the number of registered voters in a large number of precincts.

You don't think something fishy is going on there do you?

[J P Sousa]

  11 states having counties in which the number of registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens, as calculated by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey.   

I'm guessing since California has 2,350,000 illegal aliens (http://www.pewhispanic.org/interactives/unauthorized-immigrants/) and most of them considered "voting age", it would be harder to prove.

Probably a large number of illegals voted for Clinton who got 4.3 million more votes than Trump in CALIFORNIA. http://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/its-official-clintons-popular-vote-win-came-entirely-from-california/

Clinton got 2.9 million more votes than trump in the entire country. http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/