Author Topic: They had to spend 25 million...  (Read 2274 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fatboy

  • Does this gun make me look fat?
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
  • Reputation: +626/-54
  • skinnier than the average primitive
They had to spend 25 million...
« on: June 23, 2017, 09:35:58 PM »
A smoldering campfire for several days now. One of many threads that 'splain how the special election in Georgia was a special win for Dumb-O-craps.


The premise:

Quote
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 08:51 AM

Star Member ehrnst (7,053 posts)

They had to spend 25 million to hold a republican seat in a red district.
 
That's progress for us

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029232258

The reality:

Quote
Response to ehrnst (Original post)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 10:42 AM

customerserviceguy (17,445 posts)

8. And we spent the same to lose it
 
The difference is, Rethugs have money to burn, Ossoff's loss cost some of our people some necessities.

Wait a cotton pickin' minute:

Quote
Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #8)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 07:18 PM

Star Member Kaleva (16,243 posts)

19. We didn't lose it as we didn't have it in the first place.
 
They had to spend big bucks defending a piece of their own turf

Bam!



Quote
Response to ehrnst (Original post)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 10:55 AM

Star Member cstanleytech (14,530 posts)

9. Aye this wasnt really much of a win due to the amount they had to spend to hold onto that seat.

Let's apply that reasoning to Clinton spending 2.2 Billion against Trump's 750 million.

Quote
Response to ehrnst (Original post)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 10:56 AM

LBM20 (137 posts)

10. Absolutely! We made HUGE progress and THIS is the 50 state strategy everyone wants.

LBM20 (137 posts), be advised, you are not qualified to use big words like HUGE. However please explain this 50 state strategy. Is it spend money, lose elections? If so, good idea!

Quote
Response to Xipe Totec (Reply #12)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 01:17 PM

L. Coyote (40,851 posts)

13. And it changed nothing. The Rs were drained yuuugely just to hang onto what they had before

OK, L.Coyote (40,851 posts) you can use special words like yuuugely only because your DUmb-lee


Quote
Response to ehrnst (Original post)

Wed Jun 21, 2017, 07:10 PM

enid602 (6,308 posts)

17. Russia
 
And dark money from Russia Clinton Foundation might soon get scarce.


Quote
Response to oberliner (Reply #18)

Thu Jun 22, 2017, 08:31 AM

Star Member ehrnst (7,053 posts)

20. Perhaps this graphic will put it into perspective for you

picture of the Hindenburg at Lakehurst NJ May 6, 1937

Quote
Response to ehrnst (Reply #23)

Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:42 AM

oberliner (44,065 posts)

25. True, but this special election received an inordinate amount of attention and fundraising
 
There were literally record-breaking amounts of money being spent by both campaigns, so this was not your typical special election.

I donated a small amount to Ossoff's campaign. Thereafter, I was deluged with emails asking for more money - to an incredibly annoying degree. Since I assume you donated as well, you know what I'm talking about. <----  you ASSumed that DUmmy ehrnst donated anything to this or any other election  :lmao:


Quote
Response to ehrnst (Original post)

Fri Jun 23, 2017, 08:51 AM

Star Member mac56 (15,699 posts)

26. Yup. <--- Nope
 
There's a song where Warren Zevon sings, "never thought I'd have to pay so dearly for what was already mine." <--- The Beatles "I'm a Loser".

After the Georgia election this week, I bet Republicans are singing that too <---  :loser:
"We will bring back our jobs. We will bring back our borders. We will bring back our wealth - and we will bring back our dreams!" -President Donald J. Trump 1/20/17

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19511
  • Reputation: +2560/-49
Re: They had to spend 25 million...
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2017, 10:25:00 PM »
Whatever obscene amount Johnny Depp made from his latest Pirates dreck could have paid for Ossoff's entire campaign.  Lots of real yet effectively worthless money can always be found in Hollywood.  In fact, it has been backfiring for a while now.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19511
  • Reputation: +2560/-49
Re: They had to spend 25 million...
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2017, 10:27:46 PM »
And just to irk the DUmmies, $25 mil is like pocket change to the "evil dastardly Koch Brothers". :hammer:
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: They had to spend 25 million...
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2017, 10:59:14 PM »
Now that's some major goofy reasoning.

"The Republicans had to spend a bunch of money to keep a seat they already had. All it cost for us to make them spend a bunch of money was the same amount they spent plus a bunch more. We win!!"

 :mental: :mental: :mental:

.

Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline Adam Wood

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 790
  • Reputation: +75/-28
Re: They had to spend 25 million...
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2017, 05:01:16 AM »
Now that's some major goofy reasoning.

"The Republicans had to spend a bunch of money to keep a seat they already had. All it cost for us to make them spend a bunch of money was the same amount they spent plus a bunch more. We win!!"

 :mental: :mental: :mental:

.
Well, these are the same math geniuses who are convinced that we can tax ourselves right into prosperity, so this "logic" isn't really surprising coming from them.