How did we reach the place where nobody knows what the "law of the land" is until the Supreme Court rules? How did the Supreme Court acquire so much blatantly unconstitutional and immoral power?
The answer is easy: the Court stole it.
The root of this pernicious state of affairs goes all the way back to 1803 when Chief Justice John Marshall invented the concept of "judicial review" magically out of the ether.
There is no place in the Constitution where the Supreme Court is given the authority to decide what the law is and to decide what laws are constitutional and which ones aren't.
Two recent and glaring overreaches of the federal judiciary exemplify this twisted state of affairs. One is
the ruling by a low-level, bottom-rung district judge in San Francisco setting aside the president's completely lawful executive order suspending immigration from six jihadi-prone Muslim nations.
This judge paralyzed the entire government of the United States with no constitutional warrant or justification and made us vulnerable to terrorism at the same time. And everybody let him do it. Then another federal judge in Hawaii did the same thing. And everybody let him get away with it, too.
Then a federal judge in Northern California, William Orrick,
forbade the Department of Justice to withhold grants from jurisdictions which proudly and defiantly break federal law by harboring illegal alien criminals and refusing to cooperate with federal law enforcement. And again we as a nation let this self-appointed dictator shut down the wheels of government and endanger our national security. (It's worthy of note that Judge Orrick uttered not a word of complaint when President Obama threatened to withhold federal grants from school districts which did not allow grown men to shower with young girls.)
These two cases make it clear that the federal judiciary, stacked and packed by President Obama, is no longer in the business of rendering impartial rulings. No, it is in the business of advancing the progressive agenda no matter how badly judges have to twist and contort and mangle the law and the Constitution to do it. I
t is not Donald Trump who is trampling the rule of law and the Constitution, it is these arrogant and out-of-control oligarchs in black robes.The bottom line is that we no longer have even the pretense of three separate and co-equal branches of government. No,
we have only one branch of government that counts, one branch of government that rules the other two branches with an iron fist. One branch of government which contemptuously allows the other two branches what limited freedom they see fit to grant. But when it comes to all-important decisions, federal judges have the unmitigated arrogance to think they get to decide every issue of significance for the rest of us – and we just have to lump it, no matter how outrageous their opinions are.
The only solution I see is for duly elected officials with constitutionally vested power to
start ignoring these tyrannical judges. That's not civil disobedience, it's constitutional obedience.
The judges are the ones engaging in civil disobedience by trashing the plain meaning of the law and the Constitution.
https://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2017/04/28/were-down-to-one-branch-of-government
