Author Topic: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?  (Read 7139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dutch508

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12577
  • Reputation: +1731/-1068
  • Remember
Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« on: April 13, 2017, 01:07:57 PM »
Quote
Star Member HAB911 (1,794 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028927307

Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?

 :thatsright:

Quote
clarkrd (50 posts)
5. If someone else dropped this, we would say it's a warcrime. n/t

 :thatsright:
The torch of moral clarity since 12/18/07

2016 DOTY: 06 Omaha Steve - Is dying for ****'s face! How could you not vote for him, you heartless bastards!?!

Offline FiddyBeowulf

  • "Its on, its off, its on, its off." "That is called blinking, boys."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • Reputation: +523/-34
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2017, 01:12:33 PM »
If someone were to weaponize this DUmmie's stupidity...
Fire...BAD!!! - John Fetterman


The policies that are indorsed by this party, that they backer of which are much of the 1 percent, causes a social structure much like the one back before the Revolution.

-Words of wisdom from Lady Freedom Returns

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"A hat should be taken off when you greet a lady and left off for the rest of your life. Nothing looks more stupid than a hat." - P. J. O'Rourke

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2017, 01:44:01 PM »
The bomb evidentially underwent gender reassignment surgery, as Rush was saying that the bomb was described by the Pentagon as the "Father Of All Bombs." :-) :yahoo: :whistling:
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9383
  • Reputation: +1555/-29
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2017, 02:09:44 PM »
Quote
Star Member HAB911 (1,794 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028927307

Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?

Depends on whether you are the target or not.
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2017, 02:24:38 PM »
Since when did DU-folk give a @#$% about definitions? Any definition that contradicts what they want to believe is therefore Racist, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, and Everything-Else-Phobic. By definition.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline landofconfusion80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
  • Reputation: +619/-116
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2017, 02:55:38 PM »
Guess so.... if you happen to be living in a network of caves, speak Arabic, shoot AK 47s and have a general disgust for all things western culture

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

One Who Grows (244 posts)
20. absolute bullshit. the cave is unspeakably vile.

I don't know how any of you can live with yourselves.

:)

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2017, 04:40:31 PM »
Quote
Star Member HAB911 (1,794 posts) https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028927307

Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
     
Survey says:

Quote
Weapon of mass destruction (WMD), weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale and so indiscriminately that its very presence in the hands of a hostile power can be considered a grievous threat. Modern weapons of mass destruction are either nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons—frequently referred to collectively as NBC weapons. See nuclear weapon, chemical warfare, biological warfare.

https://www.britannica.com/technology/weapon-of-mass-destruction

The answer:  No.

Took me all of 20 seconds to do that dummie.  Go back to your Russians-hacked-the-election meme cause you suck at the WMD meme.


Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2017, 07:51:25 PM »
 :thatsright:

I have to give you little faggots credit.  You push the boundaries of Mental Retardation ever outward.

Good job, Faggots.
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2017, 09:16:59 PM »
:thatsright:

I have to give you little faggots credit.  You push the boundaries of Mental Retardation ever outward.

Good job, Faggots.

I'd hazard a guess and say that most LGBTQRSUVWXYZ people would be appalled by the DUmp.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2017, 09:28:32 PM »
I'm having trouble understanding why the primitives are so upset about Mother.

Apparently Mom has the explosive force--according to Google--of 11 tons of TNT.

Uh.....the first primitive atomic bomb back in 1945 had the explosive force of 20,000 tons of TNT.

Now, I wouldn't want Mom to be dropped on me, but still, it seems to me Mom's a tiny little firecracker compared with any nuclear bomb.

So how come the primitives seem more concerned about Mom, than they are about Communist Korea's nuclear weapons?
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2017, 11:33:33 PM »
I'm having trouble understanding why the primitives are so upset about Mother.

Apparently Mom has the explosive force--according to Google--of 11 tons of TNT.

Uh.....the first primitive atomic bomb back in 1945 had the explosive force of 20,000 tons of TNT.

Now, I wouldn't want Mom to be dropped on me, but still, it seems to me Mom's a tiny little firecracker compared with any nuclear bomb.

So how come the primitives seem more concerned about Mom, than they are about Communist Korea's nuclear weapons?

Because Trump dropped it and demonstrated Obama's ineffectiveness. Oh! And Trump dropped it.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline VelvetElvis

  • Misunderestimated
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1285
  • Reputation: +123/-5
  • Drill Sgt for the DeathSquadHateForce
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2017, 06:59:23 AM »
Because Trump dropped it and demonstrated Obama's ineffectiveness. Oh! And Trump dropped it.

You forgot  "and Trump!!!!"
Proud Member of the Death Squad Hate Force Since  1980

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2017, 07:31:15 AM »
Because Trump dropped it and demonstrated Obama's ineffectiveness. Oh! And Trump dropped it.

Target!

H5!
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2017, 08:23:30 AM »
You forgot  "and Trump!!!!"

Mea goofa. Lo siento.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2017, 08:28:24 AM »
Mea goofa. Lo siento.

Also, remember that to the primitives, it doesn't matter what it is; all that counts is who did it.

Since the primitives like the fat kid and loathe the president, the fat kid could blow up the world and it wouldn't bother the primitives, whereas if President Trump blew a hole through a cheap nose-tissue, the primitives'd have a cow.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12165
  • Reputation: +912/-163
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #15 on: April 16, 2017, 09:14:50 PM »
And yet all the times the military used the BLU-82 from Vietnam to Desert Storm they stayed silent over it's used and the MOAB is the weapon it replaced. Idiots.
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline DUmpsterDiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • Reputation: +139/-33
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2017, 10:22:37 PM »
Speaking of sublime...it was the democrat party (with their ATF) that declared a 2 liter Coke container half filled with Dry Ice (CO2) and left hanging in a tree well above casual passerby's a Destructive Device.

Sounds like it depends on what their definition of "mass" is.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2017, 10:50:26 PM »
Maximum payload of B52 with plain old dumb iron bombs:  70,000 pounds.  One MOAB: 21,000 pounds.

The MOAB isn't even close to the area destruction resulting from a single Buff loaded with 500 pounders delivering a 'Rain of steel.'  The MOAB is able to do a lot deeper and more devastating damage right on its point of impact (Or directly under it for an airburst) and so is much more effective on an extensive heavily hardened target...like a cave complex full of assholes who need to die.

Weapon of mass destruction?  GTFO.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2017, 05:35:35 AM »
Maximum payload of B52 with plain old dumb iron bombs:  70,000 pounds.  One MOAB: 21,000 pounds.

The MOAB isn't even close to the area destruction resulting from a single Buff loaded with 500 pounders delivering a 'Rain of steel.'

And the 'Arc Light' was three BUFFs flying in close formation, dropping all of their payloads at the same time.  If you were in that 400m x 1000m (give or take) area, you died.  No question.  No matter whether you were mammal, reptile, or plant matter.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2017, 06:05:30 AM »
no DUmbass - a WMD has wide ranging effects beyond the point of impact - radiation, poisoning, etc etc.. - all a MOAB has is a whole lotta kaboom.

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • Reputation: +3252/-248
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2017, 07:51:33 AM »
no DUmbass - a WMD has wide ranging effects beyond the point of impact - radiation, poisoning, etc etc.. - all a MOAB has is a whole lotta kaboom.

Chernobyl and Fukushima weren't nuclear bombs, but they illustrate the fact that radiation can persist for years. There's an area off Sweden in the Baltic Sea that is off-limits for fishing, due to a sunken ship that had been loaded with mustard gas shells near the end of WW2.
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9383
  • Reputation: +1555/-29
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2017, 09:06:12 AM »
And the 'Arc Light' was three BUFFs flying in close formation, dropping all of their payloads at the same time.  If you were in that 400m x 1000m (give or take) area, you died.  No question.  No matter whether you were mammal, reptile, or plant matter.

one of 3 ships in an Arc Light cell.  Nothing on the receiving end could survive.
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2017, 11:40:35 AM »
That's the 'Rain of Steel' I'm talkin' 'bout!

 :cheersmate:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2017, 11:52:23 AM »
That's the 'Rain of Steel' I'm talkin' 'bout!

 :cheersmate:

Brings a tear to my eye . . . :whistling:
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12165
  • Reputation: +912/-163
Re: Is The MOAB a weapon of mass destruction by definition?
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2017, 12:39:10 PM »

Thats what the ground looks like
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"