Trump is playing with the press: Glenn Reynolds... Trump’s basically gaslighting them. Knowing how much they hate him, he’s constantly provoking them to go over the top. Sean Spicer’s crowd-size remarks on Saturday were all about making them seem petty and negative. (And, possibly, teeing up crowd size comparisons at this Friday’s March For Life, which the press normally ignores ...).
Trump knows that the press isn’t trusted very much, and that the less it’s trusted, the less it can hurt him. So he’s prodding reporters to do things that will make them less trusted, and they’re constantly taking the bait.
They’re taking the bait because they think he’s dumb, and impulsive, and lacking self-control — but he’s the one causing them to act in ways that are dumb and impulsive, and demonstrate lack of self-control. ...
...
The killer counter-move for the press isn’t to double down on anti-Trump messaging. The counter-move is to bolster its own trustworthiness by acting (and being) more neutral and sober, and by being more trustworthy. If the news media actually focused on reporting facts accurately and straightforwardly, on leaving opinion to the pundits, and on giving Trump a clearly fair shake, then Trump’s tactics wouldn’t work ...
I don't think DJT lies awake at night worrying that the MSM will magically become non-partisan and careful to verify the accuracy and completeness of what they report.
On a more abstract plane, what the Framers hoped for in writing the Freedom of the Press clause in the 1st Amendment was that a press with a wide range of ideas and views would have the net effect of being a constraint on politicians' inclination to abuse their power (if they didn't already have personal integrity). Unfortunately, what the Framers thought unlikely, a press with a single dominant worldview has come to pass. So we have a situation, now, where the press no longer holds
all pols feet to the fire
honestly, and all the public has to try to hold the feet of the press to the fire is similarly partisan, selective, and dubious pols.