Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Aug-08-08 06:54 AMOriginal message"Senator Russ Feingold will be Obama's VP." From a post by josephcast on TPM Cafe:(snip)Caroline Kennedy is the VP vetter. Russ Feingold, along with John McCain were recipients of the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage award for their work on McCain-Feingold. Caroline Kennedy was part of that decision and clearly she has a high regard for Feingold. I'm sure he is very much on her radar. Kennedy could have even been placed on the committee to help legitimize the decision. Obama knowing he wanted Feingold, knowing Kennedy would draw the parallels of Obama, Feingold, and her father. Just as she had drawn the parallels of her father and Feingold, and her father and Obama previously.Third, the issues. Feingold has co-sponsored numerous bills that would help Senator Obama. He voted against the war, Patriot Act, FISA (bring in libertarians, independents), immigration bill. He has recently introduced the Use It or Lose It Oil Bill. The list goes on. Also, Feingold is a great public speaker. He is very intelligent and thoughtful when speaking. He explains complicated issues in a simple, easy to understand manner, as seen here. However, he speaks his mind and can speak forcefully, but I've never heard a gaffe. He'd be a great outspoken attack dog. Also, he has a plain and folksy delivery and loves to reference Wisconsin. He travels to each WI county (all 72) at least once a year.Clearly, he is popular with libertarians and Independents in Wisconsin. (2004 exit poll results here). Oh, and even Republicans admire his tenacity and his principles. Of course, he also reminds them of the McCain-Feingold bill, which they hate McCain for. Also, important is the possibility of campaign finance violations by the McCain campaign gaining tranction in the traditional media. Feingold would be great to have on hand in that event. Finally, he managed to grab some Bush voters in the 2004 election (5 to 6%).He is also a budget hawk, sits on the Select-Intelligence Committee (which is HUGE--privileged information), the Judiciary Comm, Budget Comm, and the Foreign Relations Comm, among others. The Select Comm. on Intelligence is really a big one. These Senators have had access to some of the knowledge that has been stinking up politics for the last 7 plus years (see FISA, scandals, etc).Finally, if you want an outsider, you've got one in Feingold.More: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/scoop...Thoughts?
Old Crusoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Aug-08-08 06:57 AMResponse to Original message1. Nobody has to sell me on the virtues of Russ Feingold. There are some red-state voters out there who might disagree with me, though.Feingold, for progressive Democrats and independents, would be an exhilarating choice.
Obama_for_our_future Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Aug-08-08 07:07 AMResponse to Original message2. There would be extreme enthusiasm here in the Badger State for that choice!
flblu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Fri Aug-08-08 07:07 AMResponse to Original message3. He would be a great choice!
Submitted by Bob Fertik on July 16, 2007 - 6:15pm. Impeach.TV ImpeachForChange Senator Russ Feingold visited DailyKos to explain his opposition to impeachment - and boy did he get "schooled."It is clear that there are many people in this country, including myself, who demand accountability from this Administration for the terrible mess it made in Iraq and its egregious and even illegal power grabs throughout its six-plus years in power. I believe that the President and Vice President may well have committed impeachable offenses. But with so many important issues facing this country and so much work to be done, I am concerned about the great deal of time multiple impeachment trials would take away from the Congress working on the problems of the country. The time it would take for the House to consider articles of impeachment, and for the Senate to conduct multiple trials, would make it very difficult, if not impossible, for Congress to do what it was elected to do – end the war and address some of the other terrible mistakes this Administration has made over the past six and a half years.Comments are growing exponentially - now 1,444. And no one is buying Feingold's argument.This is fascinating to me because the DailyKos community was slow to support impeachment. Kos himself adamantly opposes impeachment and none of the "A-List" bloggers supports it. But clearly the Democratic "base" now adamantly supports impeachment.
Didn't Senator Fuss hold impeachment hearings in a broom closet? I'll have to look that up later. I seem to recall him having a really bad case of BDS and getting lots of primitive love.
The sloshy lushy Mr. Pitt, the Bostonian Drunkard, is keeping his record intact. The Hussein Campaign isn't about to pick another senator to muddy-up the ticket, unless of course, the Hussein Campaign is as stupid as the Bostonian Drunkard.
