LdB blows another gasket.

[dutch508]

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028458577

***AND*** our voting machines were HACKED

I am sick to death of enabling mother****ers *pretending* that Russia stopped with the DNC.

I am sick to death of mother****ers *pretending* that they weren't here on election day.

THESE MOTHER****ERS CHEATED, LIED HACKED (and I want to be CRYSTAL CLEAR they hacked the voting machines...yes...THOSE voting machines...like THAT...I am going THERE and saying THAT)

We need to inspect them...and not just for recounting, but for malicious HACKING.

**** these lying mother****ers.

Piss on them

 

Star Member cyclonefence (64 posts)
4. I join you in your outrage

but I don't understand how voting machines could be hacked. They aren't online, right? I mean, I believe Trump's people perfectly capable of fiddling with machines, but I don't see how they could have hacked.

Please don't try to inject logic into the conversation.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
8. Yep. They can be hacked remotely AND don't forget how few votes it took to swing the electoral college.

A few well placed KGOPBers

 

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
7. HACKED MOTHER****ER. **** THESE ****ING LIARS.

Star Member longship (35,543 posts)
51. Absolute rubbish!

In my state, Michigan, all votes are on mark sense paper ballots. They are scanned in plain sight at the thousands of precincts across the state. None of the mark sense scanners are connected except to a power plug. Where I vote there is no Internet connectivity. My township hall is in the midst of a national forest, as are many here.

We take voting seriously here. Unfortunately some loonies make shit up about the integrity of our voting system without any evidence whatsoever.

Look! I get it! I don't like losing either. But making shit up does not help, this especially.

Stop it! Just stop it!

 

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
53. No, it's not and you certainly didn't watch every vote in Michigan happen, and they don't have to be connected to be hacked.

 

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
58. Again, no it's not

and I quote, because it really does apply bother ways:

You are spouting bullshit with no proof of anything, aside from a wonky nutter conspiracy theory site.

Try focusing on the ACTUAL THINGS THAT HAPPENED. There's enough outrage in those, why bother with useless conspiracy theories?

see post #13

post 13?

moda253 (109 posts)
13. What?

The internet isn't required to hack a voting machine.

We know that some of these machines come equipped with wifi and/or bluetooth enabled cards in them. We know that some states require them and some states ask that they be removed. What we don't know for sure is if all of them that were supposed to be removed were in fact removed on election day or frankly any of the days leading up to election day.

Also any machine with a port of any sort on them is susceptible to hacking. All it takes is for someone to insert a device into that port and for the program to run which could possibly take very little time. This isn't something that would necessarily need to be done during the voting process it could be done before hand and the hack writes logic into the code that flips ever X vote from D to R and then removes itself from the code at X time. ]]There likely would be fingerprints left behind but we don't know because there is nothing being done to check.

 

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
142. Do you mind if I ask what state you are in?

Folk seem to be ADAMANT this could NEEEEEEEVER happen here.

Star Member Dr Hobbitstein (4,470 posts)
40. We have no proof they were.

Last edited Wed Jan 11, 2017, 11:35 AM - Edit history (1)

Railing about something that might have happened but you have NO proof is dishonest. There are plenty of ACTUAL things that did happen. Let's concentrate on those, lest we look like a bunch of tinfoil hat wearing nutters.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
55. The Russian infilatration is certainly proof and pretending these machines, can't be, or weren't, when every other metric showed her winning diminishes you.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
60. making claims with no proof diminshes YOU

mansplain much? SEE POST #6

Star Member Dr Hobbitstein (4,470 posts)
62. Wait, now I'm mansplaining?

What the ****ing **** is your malfunction?

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
65. My ****ing malfunction is that the voting machines were hacked

see post #6.

Star Member Dr Hobbitstein (4,470 posts)
67. Bull. ****ing. Shit.

See post #67.

  ok, that was funny.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
122. I *get* that you're saying that, but you have no ****ing proof and there is a LOT of proof that something was afoot.

But you *need* the last word.

And I *like* entertainment.

tritsofme (12,452 posts)
139. LOL, this has to be an act...right?

...please? Restore some of my faith in humanity here!

 

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
125. Nope, your confirmation bias precludes you from seeing the facts

and I am sorry for that.

Star Member Dr Hobbitstein (4,470 posts)
131. What ****ing facts?

You haven't presented a SINGLE fact. Just pulled bullshit out of your ass and straight up rebuked any attempt to SHOW YOU ACTUAL ****ING FACTS!!! You are DEVOID of facts.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
133. So *astounding* this bias of yours.

post #42, #115, #118

and the FACT that you *just* *can't* leave this alone. 

But thanks for the kick

Dreamer3 (37 posts)
11. Not only hacked...

but the election fraud and corruption is why the republicans got so many seats. ONE THOUSAND SEATS!

It is a long list, to include, purging voter rolls and gerrymandering.

Star Member mopinko (47,209 posts)
14. i knew that when we went down.

methinks they werent even that sneaky, that they knew if someone was watching, county by county, that someone would pick up on something. we would pick up on it, w our eyes everywhere, and all on the counting.

3 surprise states by just enough to avoid a recount? never swallowed it.

Yes. the Russians took down DU on election day because they knew you would catch them rigging the election.

 

Star Member Dem2 (5,306 posts)
29. They hacked the voters

The polling error was too wide ranging and was concentrated in areas with higher blue collar white suburban voters ( I live here I witnessed the brainwashing.) This was a mind attack (assisted by Russian internet spamming and Comey), not a physical voting machine attack.

It's possible that some places had machines that were attacked, but that's not possible where I live and yet the results here were in line with the other places that have machines that could possibly be attacked, so it wasn't enough to swing the election in my opinion.

Go to any Ford or Chevy High Performance Automotive website and you will find clocks showing the countdown to Obama leaving and sheep there that will defend Trump no matter if he killed live babies on TV. The brainwashing is real. The ridiculous partisan hate is real. The bigotry is real.

ecstatic (21,382 posts)
30. Yep. Trump's approval is currently 37% and dropping; he lost by

nearly 3 million votes. Something really stinks! I still don't think Americans are that stupid.

 

he's at 42.7 and rising. btw

mythology (6,322 posts)
38. You have exactly no evidence to support your claim

No matter how much you stomp your feet and sling insults, you aren't any better than Ken Ham claiming nothing could change his mind about evolution, based on nothing but his own unsupported assumptions.

You can use all caps, throw in as many uses of the word ****, insult everybody who has the temerity to question you, and none of it makes you right.

As I have pointed out in other threads you've posted in, there was virtually no difference between Wisconsin counties that did hand recounts and those that used machines. You don't have an answer to the gigantic hole that blows in your theory.

Star Member hamsterjill (7,965 posts)
48. I don't know WTF happened on election day, but I know that SOMETHING did.

There is no way in hell that the polls were THAT wrong. No way. Even the Republican white men that I work around on a daily basis were insisting that Hillary was going to win in a landslide.

I don't know if machines were hacked, or results were somehow changed or what, but the very fact that there could be a possibility of ANYTHING happening should be reason enough to do a thorough and complete investigation of each and every vote cast. How can we trust the system if it is not open and transparent?

Star Member brooklynite (36,150 posts)
49. Prove it

I'm sick to death of people throwing out "we all know" conspiracy theories with no evidence.

Hillary Clinton doesn't say voting machines were hacked.

Barack Obama doesn't say voting machines were hacked.

Bernie Sanders doesn't say voting machines were hacked.

NO LOSING CANDIDATE says voting machines were hacked.

NO PARTY OFFICIAL says voting machines were hacked.


But maybe anonymous bloggers are savvier than they are.

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
68. PROVE THEY WEREN'T.

Star Member qanda (10,138 posts)
113. I still think that is why DU went down

Information was starting to be filtered about voting irregularities. It was very interesting.

[franksolich]

Isn't it kind of past time for the LaydeeBug primitive to burn out and be seen no more.

Her hysterics make even Jugs, the BainsBane primitive, look composed and rational.

[BlueStateSaint]

Isn't it kind of past time for the LaydeeBug primitive to burn out and be seen no more.

Her hysterics make even Jugs, the BainsBane primitive, look composed and rational.

She's doing this at the wrong time of the year . . .

[Gina]

Star Member longship (35,543 posts)
51. Absolute rubbish!

In my state, Michigan, all votes are on mark sense paper ballots. They are scanned in plain sight at the thousands of precincts across the state. None of the mark sense scanners are connected except to a power plug. Where I vote there is no Internet connectivity. My township hall is in the midst of a national forest, as are many here.

We take voting seriously here. Unfortunately some loonies make shit up about the integrity of our voting system without any evidence whatsoever.

Look! I get it! I don't like losing either. But making shit up does not help, this especially.

Stop it! Just stop it!

Dang!  I have HOPE that they aren't all like her!

[DUmpstruck]

She's doing this at the wrong time of the year . . .

I'm thinking it is LDB's wrong time of the month.

[freedumb2003b]

Star Member LaydeeBug (8,488 posts)
68. PROVE THEY WEREN'T.

There should be a Goodwin's Law for using "prove a negative" as a argument tactic.  Once you do, the argument is over and you have lost.

[VelvetElvis]

I'm thinking it is LDB's wrong time of the month.

Except that she's been at it for more than two whole months now.
She would have died from anemia by now.

Nope, Dr. VE's diagnosis is "one more batshit crazy loon at the DUmp",  an all-too-common affliction in those parts.
Alas, there seems to be no cure.

[FunkyZero]

Isn't it kind of past time for the LaydeeBug primitive to burn out and be seen no more.

Her hysterics make even Jugs, the BainsBane primitive, look composed and rational.

I think she's not quite in the red giant stage just yet.
Her internal perception of herself as overly important and rancorous is definitely on the rise.
Before long, she will see herself as the leader of the rage brigade. She'll eventually cross the line and collapse into the white dwarf stage after a smack down or 2.

[USA4ME]

Nobody's ever accused her of being a debate coach, at least that I know about.

.

[DumbAss Tanker]

She's gone completely off the rails.  There's more bad logic and bad information in her arguments than in an Occupy Democrats meme.  I'm beginning to wonder if she is a mole playing for crazy, or just really crazy.

[SVPete]

...  I'm beginning to wonder if she is a mole playing for crazy, or just really crazy.

H-5! Those are my current theories. A mole trying to see how crazy (s)he can get before being banned won't look different from a genuine crazy. At her current rate, I don't see Buggee lasting past March. She has too many DU-folk coming down on her looniness.

[BattleHymn]

I think she's not quite in the red giant stage just yet.
Her internal perception of herself as overly important and rancorous is definitely on the rise.
Before long, she will see herself as the leader of the rage brigade. She'll eventually cross the line and collapse into the white dwarf stage after a smack down or 2.

The opposite of the white dwarf stage would be the bald fat dwarf stage, where no amount of smackdown stops the stupidity.

 re: nadinbrezezinski

[thundley4]

Star Member longship (35,543 posts)
51. Absolute rubbish!

In my state, Michigan, all votes are on mark sense paper ballots. They are scanned in plain sight at the thousands of precincts across the state.

Um, no.  In some precincts there were no republican poll watchers.

Also, in Detroit a bunch of precincts were disqualified from the recount because there were more votes registered on the machine than there were ballots cast.

This implies that Hillary's people were cheating by running ballots through more than once.

There is voter fraud, but it comes from the left.

[ADsOutburst]

Good grief. Sometimes they don't even try to hide their double-standards.

"I don't have to prove my claims; you have to prove yours and disprove mine." /LaydeeBug logic.

[Maverick1987]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbHgjwSUvTs[/youtube]