Then there's the "news" source "Liberal_in_LA" linked in his/her OP, Slate.com. Slate was one of the purveyors of the triply false story about the Jewish family who supposedly fled their home county due to being singled out in Fox and Breitbart articles about the cancellation of a Christmas play. The three falsehoods in Slate's article:
* The Jewish family went on a previously planned vacation, they didn't flee anything;
* Fox's article did not name any family, did not mention any religion, and didn't give any clues to anyone's identity;
* Breitbart's article did not name any family, did not mention any religion, and didn't give any clues to anyone's identity.
I just checked the Slate article, and it has been updated to note that the family went on a vacation rather than fleeing in fear. It did not state that they were wrong about Fox's and Breitbart's articles. Unsurprisingly. At BEST, Slate was grossly sloppy, in failing to actually read Fox's and Breitbart's articles. Even I - not anything close to a journalist - thought of doing that in the context of a FB discussion of Slate's story. IOW, at BEST, Slate made a first-week-of-Journalism-101-grade error. Having seen Slate's weaselly update of the story, Slate was and is more malign that that.
So, in addition to the politicizing funding of the organizations that had hands in that "study", the "news" source that reported it is highly partisan and malignly sloppy.