http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027921822
1. More power to them - as long as they can pass a background check I am happy that they are able to exercise their second amendment rights.
romanic (2,210 posts)
3. Even thought I don't carry...
I def support my fellow gay and lesbians to arm and protect themselves. Obviously they're not buying assault rifles or uzis so that tired "ammosexual" meme can stay at the door. We have rights to protect ourselves at all costs, there's nothing funny or right-wing about that.
2. ^^^ Ironic post is ironic. Of course if you are a member of the correct group then the right to keep and bear arms is self evident. Second amendment rights are only canceled for members of the wrong groups.
1. Contrary to Libs' and Progs' stereotype of theologically conservative Christians like me, I'm totally fine with homosexuals obtaining and having the wherewithal to defend themselves from violent attacks. And if a Phelpsian actually turned violent - or a skinhead went on a bashing expedition and attacked the "wrong" gay or lesbian - and got taken out, I wouldn't shed a tear.
2. The post is hypocritical and incoherent. Me buying a semi-automatic rifle to defend myself and my family is being an "ammosexual", but a gay or lesbian buying the same semi-automatic rifle (unlike this DU idiot, I know that "assault weapon" is a political term, and that fully automatic Uzis basically cannot be bought in the US) is totally cool?
