Clinton caught in a lie

[fatboy]

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:45 PM

Star Member Rosa Luxemburg (28,243 posts)

Hillary's aides were interviewed by FBI the last few weeks (CNN) why did she say that they weren't
 
In recent weeks, multiple aides have been interviewed -- some more than once, the officials said.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html

yet

And Clinton on MSNBC said neither she nor her staff have yet been contacted by the FBI, which is investigating the handling of classified information on the private email server she used a secretary of state.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/clinton-im-really-focused-moving-the-general-election


so which is it? If one is lying then one has to be consistent

It is going to be so much fun watching the hillbots crow when she becomes the official canidate and the bernsters have to get on board with her.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511908782

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:48 PM

Star Member Renew Deal (67,554 posts)

1. Maybe it was true when she said it
 
Huma was interviewed very recently.

 

Response to Renew Deal (Reply #1)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:49 PM

NWCorona (4,328 posts)

3. Nope!
 
Huma was interviewed on April 5th and Hillary gave the interview this week.

I think that DUmmy NWCorona is against democracy or something like it.

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:50 PM

Press Virginia (1,018 posts)

4. I don't think she knows how to tell the truth

I don't think DUmmy Press Virginia knows exactly when or how Skinner will pull the plug on he/she/it but it's gonna be soon.

Response to Barack_America (Reply #6)

Fri May 6, 2016, 12:19 AM

Star Member fun n serious (2,569 posts)

39. Current staff and SOS aids are different...

Now there is a DUmmy that thinks on he/she/it's feet.

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 10:11 PM

bobbobbins01 (1,260 posts)

10. But but but....maybe Huma didn't TELL Hillary she was contacted

yep

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #17)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:33 PM

HooptieWagon (16,152 posts)

25. Why would she claim she came under sniper fire?
 

She is just a habitual liar.

A better question to ask...Why do you believe that Sanders has a chance?

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:31 PM

Star Member Rosa Luxemburg (28,243 posts)

24. It's awfully quiet on this thread
 
you could hear 'a pin drop'

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #24)

Fri May 6, 2016, 10:11 AM

Star Member bigtree (63,060 posts)

57. bullshit speculation/baiting
 

...you're leveraging off of right-wing scandalmongering in a cynical attempt to support your candidate.

You don't deserve substantive responses.

Commie Rosa Luxemberg gets schooled by commie Big Tree

[Carl]

Pretzel logic at its best.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Actually 'fun n serious' nails the Clinton doublethink and word-parsing perfectly.

[Karin]

DUmmie was right when she said she doesn't know how to tell the truth.  She lies even when it's not necessary.  And look how easy she makes it seem!  That's the type of person you want to run, not walk, away from.

[FlaGator]

Just because you libs view something as "right-wing scandalmongering" doesn't make it untrue.

[DumbAss Tanker]

"Clinton caught in a lie."

 

[JakeStyle]

DUmmy Press Virginia is a fairly level headed DUmmy, he probably won't last long.

[CollectivismMustDie]

I think that DUmmy NWCorona is against democracy or something like it.

And obviously a racist too.



CMD

[SVPete]

A lie by The CHILL being exposed is close to a weekly phenomenon. I heard, yesterday, about this, from Judicial Watch:

Judicial Watch Lawsuit Uncovers More Hillary Clinton Emails Withheld from State Department

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released new State Department emails (one batch of 103 pages, the second of 138 pages) that again appear to contradict statements by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department and that she did not use her clintonemail.com system until March 18, 2009.

Judicial Watch recently released Clinton State Department emails dating from February 2009 that also call into question her statements about her emails.
...
On August 10, 2015, Judicial Watch announced that the State Department submitted to the court a sworn declaration from Clinton regarding federal records on her controversial email system.  The declaration states:

I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.

As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.

Cheryl Mills did not have an account on clintonemail.com. Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government business.

The document is signed by “Hillary Rodham Clinton.” ...

Unlike the lie Rosa L complains of, this lie constitutes perjury.

The Rs should set up a special, Hillary Clinton Lie of the Week website, and in addition to the weekly pieces, supplement with "classic" Hillary whoppers (like her ludicrously false claim to have deplaned under fire in Bosnia or her anachronous, spelling-challenged claim to have been named for Sir Edmund Hilary).