The Trollgate scandal has hit DUmmieland in which a former PAID Hillary troll confesses all. What makes this an uberscandal is the accusation that PAID Hillary Shill, Skinner, reactivated closed DUmmie accounts for use by the PAID Hillary trolls. First the confession followed by the accusation:
TROLLGATE: Hillary Shill Just Spilled The Beans On Trollgate…And It’s Getting Weirderthis was posted on Reddit. The original post has been deleted, but luckily it’s been screen capped so that we can see a unique portrait into the Hillary Paid Troll Scandal:
And now...Confessions of a Hillary Troll:
Good afternoon. As of today, I am officially a former “digital media specialist†(a nice way to say “paid Internet trollâ€) previously employed by Hillary Clinton’s campaign (through a PR firm). I’m posting here today as a confession of sorts because I can no longer continue to participate in something that has become morally-indigestible for me. (This is a one-time throwaway account, but I’ll stick around for this thread.)
First, my background. I am [redacted] … and first became involved in politics during the 2008 presidential race. I worked as a volunteer for Hillary during the Democratic primary and then for the Democratic Party in the general election. I was not heavily involved in the 2012 election cycle (employment issues – volunteering doesn’t pay the rent), and I wasn’t really planning on getting involved in this cycle until I was contacted by a friend from college around six months ago about working on Hillary’s campaign.
I was skeptical at first (especially after my experience as an unpaid volunteer in 2008), but I eventually came around. The work time and payment was flexible, and I figured that I could bring in a little extra money writing about things I supported anyways. After some consideration, I emailed my resume to the campaign manager he had named, and within a week, I was in play. I don’t want to get bogged down on this subject, but I was involved with PPP (pay per post) on forums and in the comments section of (mostly-liberal) news and blog sites. Spending my time on weekends and evenings, I brought in roughly an extra $100 or so a week, which was a nice cushion for me.
At first, the work was fun and mostly unsupervised. I posted mostly positive things about Hillary and didn’t engage in much negativity. Around the middle of July, however, I received notification that the team would be focusing not on pro-Hillary forum management, but on “mitigation†(the term our team leader used) for a Vermont senator named Bernie Sanders. I’d been out of college for several years and hadn’t heard much about Sanders, and so I decided to do some research to get a feel for him.
To be honest, I was skeptical of what Sanders was saying at the beginning, and didn’t have much of a problem pointing out the reasons why I believed that Hillary was the better candidate. Over a period of two months, I gradually started to find Bernie appealing, even if I still disagreed with him on some issues. By September, I found myself as a closet Bernie supporter, though I still believed that Hillary was the only electable Democratic candidate.
The real problem for me started around the end of September and the beginning of October, when there was a change of direction from the team leader again. Apparently, the higher-ups in the firm caught wind of an impending spending splurge by the Clinton campaign that month and wanted to put up an impressive display. We received very specific instructions about how and what to post, and I was aghast at what I saw. It was a complete change in tone and approach, and it was extremely nasty in character. We changed from advocates to hatchet men, and it left a very bad taste in my mouth.
Just to give you an idea, here are some of the guidelines for our posting in October:
1) Sexism. This was the biggest one we were supposed to push. We had to smear Bernie as misogynistic and out-of-touch with modern sensibilities. He was to be characterized as “an old white male relic that believed women enjoyed being gang rapedâ€. Anyone who tried to object to this characterization would be repeatedly slammed as sexist until they went away or people lost interest.
2) Racism. We were instructed to hammer home how Bernie supporters were all privileged white students that had no idea how the world worked. We had to tout Hillary’s great record with “the blacks†(yes, that’s the actual way it was phrased), and generally use racial identity politics to attack Sanders and bolster Hillary as the only unifying figure.
3) Electability. All of those posts about how Sanders can never win and Hillary is inevitable? Some of those were us, done deliberately in an attempt to demoralize Bernie supporters and convince them to stop campaigning for him. The problem is that this was an outright fabrication and not an accurate assessment of the current political situation. But the truth didn’t matter – we were trying to create a new truth, not to spread the existing truth.
4) Dirty tactics. This is where things got really bad. We were instructed to create narratives of Clinton supporters as being victimized by Sanders supporters, even if they were entirely fabricated. There were different instructions about how to do it, but something like this (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/31/1443064/-Dis-heartened-Hillary-Supporter) is a perfect example. These kind of posts are manufactured to divide and demoralize Sanders supporters, and are entirely artificial in nature. (The same thing happened in 2008, but it wasn’t as noticeable before social media and public attention focused on popular forums like Reddit).
5) Opponent outreach. There are several forums and imageboards where Sanders is not very popular (I think you can imagine which ones those are.) We were instructed to make pro-Sanders troll posts to rile up the user base and then try to goad them into raiding or attacking places like this subreddit. This was probably the only area where we only had mixed success, since that particular subset of the population were more difficult to manipulate than we originally thought.
In any case, the final nail in the coffin for me happened last night. I was on an imageboard trying to rile up the Trump-supporting natives with inflammatory Bernie posting, and the sum of responses I received basically argued that at least Bernie was genuine in his belief, even if they disagreed with his positions, which made him infinitely better than the 100% amoral and power-hungry Hillary.
I had one of those “what are you doing with your life†moments. When even the scum of 4chan think that your candidate is too scummy for their tastes, you need to take a good hard look at your life. Then this morning I read that the National Association of Broadcasters were bankrolling both Clinton and Rubio, and that broke the camel’s back. I emailed my resignation this morning.
I’m going to go all in for Bernie now, because I truly believe that the Democratic Party has lost its way, and that redemption can only come by standing for something right and not by compromising for false promises and fake ideals. I want to apologize to everyone here for my part in this nasty affair, and I hope you will be more aware of attempts to sway you away from supporting the only candidate that can bring us what we need.
http://marshallreport.com/2016/04/24/trollgate-hillary-shill-just-spilled-the-beans-on-trollgate-and-its-getting-weirder/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280183957And now Trollgate gets really interesting when the DUmmies start wondering how DUmmie screenname accounts that were years ago extremely anti-Hillary got very pro-Hillary in the past year when those screennames suddenly reappeared from their long hibernation:
I'm sure this will be totally dismissed by the Hillary crowd here, but it sure has the ring of truth.
One thing I've noticed is how many of the most vociferous and nasty Hillary defenders here are either quite new, or somehow had an account that was created four or eight years ago, was apparently dormant, and now suddenly is quite active and quite pro-Hillary.
Makes me wonder if there's a way to find old, unused accounts here and hack into them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280183957#post3
No need to hack when it is an INSIDE JOB. Hee! Hee!
Well there is one small group of DU'ers who have access to all the account info
You can guess who they are, but they are adamantly pro-HRC...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280183957#post4
Let me guess.... Would it be a certain DUmmie leader who is paid off via his wife by the Hillary campaign to the tune of up to $14,000 per month?
For me, one telling thing is when people who LOATHED Hillary now think she's just peachy. The only thing that can make them do that is if they represent the establishment, if they represent the corporate/Third Way wing of the Dem Party.
The other, more obvious tell is when people did 180 degree shifts on serious policy issues that would require tossing aside your principles to do so. Things like civil rights, privacy, whistle-blowers, drone strikes, free trade... you name it. When BushCo did it it was bad but when Obama did it it was to be defended and applauded.
This is why our country is in the dire condition it is in for the average citizen. There is a large contingent of Dems who have forgotten to stand true to their morals and principles and just play the game to win and please their corporate masters.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280183957#post8
Skinner stands true to his bank account and that healthy monthly inflow of Clinton Cash. Of course, the DUmmies still mostly refrain from saying what most of them are now thinking: Skinner, under the influence of his HUGE monthly Clinton Cash payments, reactivated inactive DUmmie accounts and allowed PAID Hillary Trolls to post favorably for Her Thighness in DUmmieland.
For verification of Skinner's corruption, just Google his wife's name, "Shelly Moskwa" to see the FEC documents which list the massive Hillary payments to her (and hubby). For you lazy DUmmies, I'll make it even easier and provide you the direct link to the latest FEC document so you can scroll down to "Shelly Moskwa" and see the March $14,000 payoff for yourselves.
http://docquery.fec.gov/pres/2016/M3/C00575795/B_PAYEE_C00575795.html
