« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: primitives discuss Rhode Island closing polling places  (Read 846 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitives discuss Rhode Island closing polling places
« on: April 21, 2016, 09:30:51 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141423216

Oh my.

Quote
Cobalt Violet (8,736 posts)    Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:30 AM

Rhode Island closes 66 percent of polling places to cut election costs
 
The Rhode Island Board of Elections announced this week that two-thirds of the state’s polling places would remain closed for the upcoming primary as a costs savings measure.

According to WPRI, the Board of Elections plans to cut costs by opening only 144 of the state’s 419 polling places for the April 26 primary.

Board of Elections Director Robert Rapoza argued that the state had handled record turnout in 2008 after implementing similar cost savings measures.

But since 2008, the state has reduced the total number of polling places. Meaning that there were 33 more voting locations in 2008 than there will be this year.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/rhode-island-closes-66-percent-of-polling-places-to-cut-election-costs/

Here we go again.

The primitives of course fail to see why things such as this happen.

Rhode Island is a notoriously corrupt state, full of politicians and buddies of politicians who need paid off for this or that.  Money that could be allocated for public services such as voting, or public assistance such as food stamps, has to be diverted to their pockets.

In other words, little children go hungry so that some old obese carbuncle-faced public employee--or one of his friends--can be paid.

Kapeesh?  Understand?

But I dunno what the big deal is.  This is Rhode Island.  There's front yards in Nebraska bigger than Rhode Island, so it's not as if voters of that state have to journey for miles and hours to get somewhere to vote.
Logged
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline FiddyBeowulf

  • "Its on, its off, its on, its off." "That is called blinking, boys."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5271
  • Reputation: +523/-34
Re: primitives discuss Rhode Island closing polling places
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2016, 09:54:43 AM »
Quote from: franksolich on April 21, 2016, 09:30:51 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141423216


But I dunno what the big deal is. 
DUmmies are lazy. Having to go one more mile to get to their polling place = Jim Crow/need for the DOJ or the UN to investigate.   :whatever:
Logged
Fire...BAD!!! - John Fetterman


The policies that are indorsed by this party, that they backer of which are much of the 1 percent, causes a social structure much like the one back before the Revolution.

-Words of wisdom from Lady Freedom Returns

"Arguing with liberals...it's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board and strut around like it's victorious." -- Anonymous

"A hat should be taken off when you greet a lady and left off for the rest of your life. Nothing looks more stupid than a hat." - P. J. O'Rourke

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: primitives discuss Rhode Island closing polling places
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2016, 01:41:53 PM »
Why should there be a repuke primary in California, or Rhode Island, or New York, or any northeastern state?

Those states are guaranteed democrat landslides in November.

If the primary season made any sense, swing states would be the only participants.

Instead, the scattering of repukes in solid blue states have a vastly disproportionate influence on the nomination.

The purpose should be to win the November election.

The Republican Party should, unfortunately, ignore New York, California, and other blue cesspools, and deny them the ability to influence the nomination.

Winning swing states is the only thing that matters in November.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »