Kansas gunman kills 3, injures 14 before dying in shootout with police
Published February 26, 2016
FoxNews.com
Yeppers:
* A PC minority perp;
* Possibly racially motivated;
* Possibly a known petty thug;
* Another probable "guns-free zone".
Too many potentially embarrassing unknowns, there's no way known yet to transmogrify the perp into a victim, and he might a member of more than one PC minority group.
Come on, these are the DUmmies you're talking about. They excel at moral equivalency and the ultra- liberal "Blame the victim, acquit the monster" strategy for vile fiends, especially when the vile fiends in question happen to be minorities.
They'll claim that he MUST have been suffering as the result of racially motivated mistreatment/ bullying/ discrimination since blacks make up such a small percentage of Kansas's population, and finally decided one day to righteously strike back against his tormentors. Everyone he shot will be portrayed as an evil, racist monster who deserved to die.
If he's served time (And his tats seem to indicate that's the case), they'll use it to shriek about the evils of America using prisons, claiming that he must have been a sweet man before prison life made him angry and violent.
Oh, and since he was a black man fatally shot by a cop, you know they'll portray him as a sweet, undeserving victim of police brutality, demand that the officer in question be fired and brought up on criminal charges, and the Black Lives Matter freaks will add him to their list of "Martyrs."
"Career criminal, jailhouse tats, prohibited from owning firearms, violent toward his woman, order of protection served on him just before the shooting."
So, as was the case with nearly all of the past mass shootings, and the overwhelming majority of gun- related crimes in general, the gun(s?) in question were illegally owned in the first place.
Any of you DUmmies still think more gun laws will stop mass shootings from happening?
