Author Topic: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina  (Read 1650 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« on: February 04, 2016, 07:23:32 PM »
franksolich’s “game” is simply put—I fully intend upon supporting and voting for the Republican candidate for president later this year, no matter who it is.  I have no preferred candidate; they all look pretty good to me, of course each with their own distinct strengths and weaknesses.

That’s the bottom line here; I’d no sooner vote for a Democrat than stick my dick in an electric meat-grinder.  No way.

However.

However.

However.

While waiting for my fellow Republicans to make up their minds, one must do something, anything, to be amused and entertained.  And what better way to preoccupy one’s time than helping the Democrats, liberals, and primitives select their own candidate for president?

About mid-year last year, when I was first contemplating this, it looked likely there’d be lots and lots of choices for anyone seeking a Democrat candidate to support.  Messalina Agrippina, who’d been wrongly denied the nomination eight years ago in favor of someone considerably less qualified and of dubious intelligence, of course had been in the race for quite some time.

This was long before the perpetually-indignant Methuselah reared his hoary old head; there were like about eight or ten candidates considered “credible.”

Of course, things have changed—as they always do—since then.

When it came time to make up my mind about which Democrat I was willing to support—for the Democrat nomination, not for the presidency—the race had evolved to pretty much between the worthier candidate and old sourpuss, with Marvin O’Mallory, who’s since dropped out, a distant but still credible third.

Despite what Skippy, the now-banned NYC_SKP primitive, had insisted for months that grumpy old sourass was “more left” than the lady, Skippy as usual was lying.  He has a habit of doing that.  Both the top two candidates are equally extreme fringe far left, Tweedledum and Tweedledee when it comes to ideology.

Their politics, their aspirations for themselves and for America, are so much alike one can’t even jam a single-ply sheet of toilet-paper in between them. 

Sex appeal?  One has to admit the lady’s more carnally exciting than the old geezer.

Charm?  Well, the lady’s not exactly Carly Fiorina or Ivanka Trump, but the scowling old guy looks as if he subsists on a diet lacking in fiber and roughage, his rectal aperture permanently sewn shut.

If I had to guess, the lady’s considerably brighter than the senescent old fart.  I’m however hesitant to use “intelligence” as a criteria for president; it’s such an ambiguous, nebulous, thing, intelligence, that no one really knows how to measure it.  All one knows is that Omaha Steve and MrsCorpio are way down on the “stupid” scale, and the black-colored guy in the White House is probably down there too, but that’s it.

So what to do?  How was franksolich to make a choice between her and him?

Over time, I’d watched as the primitives on Skins’s island began taking sides, and noticed something.

All primitives are unbearable; there’s not a nice thing one can say about any of them.

However.

However.

However.

I’ve always noticed that those primitives supporting the worthier candidate always struck me as being somewhat more bearable than the primitives bullying for Bernie.

Not a whole lot more bearable, but somewhat more bearable. 

They’re pompous arrogant asses full of themselves, but not quite as much as the Bernie bullies.

And so that’s why franksolich has been supporting Messalina Agrippina.

Not for president, but for the Democrat nomination, and once she gets it, it’s reasonable for the primitives supporting her, to take for granted that franksolich will be less of a nice guy than he has been.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2016, 07:37:41 PM »
The difference between crazy old bernie cultists is that they actually enjoy being lied to whereas supporters of the hildabeast have to cringe and look away from her lifetime of lies. 

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2016, 09:07:11 PM »
My, my.

Thanks to our good friend Delmar here, apparently the ill-tempered old man's been unfair to women.

Quote
.....and the war he is waging on women?

This is not a new problem for Democrats. A previous Washington Free Beacon analysis of the fiscal year 2011 found that Democratic Senate offices were paying female staffers far less than their male coworkers during that year as well.

Women were also paid less than men at the Democratic National Committee, in Obama’s White House, and on his 2012 presidential campaign.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.), who caucuses with the Democrats, was the worst of the gender pay gap offenders in the previous analysis. He remains near the bottom of the list, with the average female salary $21,730 lower than the average salary received by men in his office.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/senate-dems-remain-on-front-lines-in-war-on-women/

Other notable Senators whose “gender pay gap” was larger than 23 percent:

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.)—47.6 percent

http://freebeacon.com/politics/senate-dems-betray-lilly/

Bernie probably figures that female staffers don't deserve as much as men since they are just going to sit around the office all day painting their fingernails and fantasizing about getting raped.

comment 22:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=106294.0
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline CollectivismMustDie

  • American
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4057
  • Reputation: +1587/-42
  • (D)Ummie nightmare.
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2016, 01:01:11 AM »


When it came time to make up my mind about which Democrat I was willing to support—for the Democrat nomination, not for the presidency—the race had evolved to pretty much between the worthier candidate and old sourpuss, with Marvin O’Mallory, who’s since dropped out, a distant but still credible third.

Sex appeal?  One has to admit the lady’s more carnally exciting than the old geezer.

What fun can be had with that name. Marvin O’Mallory, Mallory O'moron, Moron O'marvin...and they all fit.

As to the sex appeal of those two, there is always a third far more palatable option:


[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn91QAL4veY&feature=youtu.be&t=7[/youtube]

"...You'll probably want to take your own life...Here, you better have this..."

 :-)


CMD

"Be not intimidated... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

Hillary Clinton will never be the President of the United States.

Offline JakeStyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3146
  • Reputation: +359/-39
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2016, 01:48:54 AM »
I can't stand the crusty socialist curmudgeon, but I think it his lower lip that bothers me the most.  It's always moist to the point of being greasy, and it seems to flail about independent of the rest of his face.  It's just gross to look at.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2016, 05:17:24 AM »
I can't stand the crusty socialist curmudgeon, but I think it his lower lip that bothers me the most.  It's always moist to the point of being greasy, and it seems to flail about independent of the rest of his face.  It's just gross to look at.

During the early 1990s, I had a job, a really boring job, where I had the chance to watch television; because it was available, I watched C-Span almost exclusively.  This was when Methuselah was new to Congress, as a congressman.

He fascinated me in that his righteous indignation seemed so, well, so perpetuating.

I couldn't hear what he was whining about, but the righteous indignation was loud and clear.

Watching closely, it also struck me that the guy sputters and spits as he talks.  I wouldn't want to be within reaching distance of him in person, unless there was a sheet of 3/4" transparent plexiglass between us.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2016, 05:23:01 AM »
The difference between crazy old bernie cultists is that they actually enjoy being lied to whereas supporters of the hildabeast have to cringe and look away from her lifetime of lies.

I didn't see the debate between the two Democrats when it was going on, but someone kindly taped it for me for later viewing (which is a favor sometimes done because of my need to constantly back-track, going over things I failed to grasp the first time around).

The old crank showed his true colors.  He should be ashamed of himself.  He's old enough that he was raised during a kinder and gentler era, when people were more respectful of each other, especially women, than they are now. 

The way he treated a lady, the things he said to her, well, no honest gentleman would behave that way towards a lady, not even a fallen one. 

The guy, like the Bernie bullies on Skins's island, has no class, no grace, no manners.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: why I'm supporting Messalina Agrippina
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2016, 08:01:04 AM »
Rank and file Dems are crazy enough as it is. But the bern-out wing, just like the Howard Dean wing in 2004, are the insane of the insane. They really need to depart the Dem party and either join the Greens or form their own.

You keep reading how the Tea Party wing of the R's makes them nervous. However, I fail to see why on a major scale. The most the Tea Party wants is for the Fed gov't to be limited in its scope. The bern-outs want to expand gov't to the point it can nationalize industries. So what's the bigger threat to the "establishment"; the one who wants to put the brakes on the size of gov't, or the one who wants to use the gov't to steal your business?

At some point, these far left whackos are going to have to be dealt with by diminishing them by separating them out of the political process, or by jailing them, or by shooting them.

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.