Author Topic: National Guard Bouncy  (Read 1680 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6243
  • Reputation: +1787/-29
National Guard Bouncy
« on: January 07, 2016, 05:46:01 PM »
Quote
Bigmack (7,785 posts)

I'm going around and around with a RWer about the National Guard...


This is, of course, related to the terrorist take-over of the wildlife refuge in Oregon.

I read, from Title 10, that the President doesn't need authorization from a state to Federalize the Guard in that state.
The RWer says the President has to get permission from the state Governor.

Anybody know for sure which way? Apparently Dubya did some kind of a change, and then the change was repealed. I've researched, but can find no definitive answer.

Here's Title 10 for reference.. Title 32 is at the URL below.....
"10 USC § 332 – Use of Militia and Armed Forces to Enforce Federal Authority: Whenever the President
considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the U.S.,
make it impractical to enforce the laws of the U.S. in any State or Territory by the ordinary course of judicial
proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces
as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion. This section is a statutory
exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.
6. 10 USC § 333 – Interference with State and Federal Law: The President, by using the militia or the armed
forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a
State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if it:
a. So hinders the execution of the law of that State, and of the U.S. within the State, that any part or class
of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity or protection named in the Constitution and
secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail or refuse to protect that
right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
b. Opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the U.S. or impedes the course of justice under those
laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal
protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
7. 10 USC § 12406 – Air and Army National Guard: Air and Army National Guard call into Federal service in case
of invasion, rebellion or inability to execute Federal law with active forces."
http://www.ngaus.org/sites/default/files/Guard%20Statues.pdf

These are so boring nowadays.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027508911

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2016, 06:00:22 PM »
DUmmies really want a civil war to start and they want a black president to cause it.

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2016, 06:34:27 PM »
DUmmies really want a civil war to start and they want a black president to cause it.

And dummies better be careful what they ask for... they just may get it.  All it would take would be for the food producing and energy producing states to embargo the lib states and within two weeks the lib cities would descend into anarchy.  The civil war would be over as the rich libbie leaders flee the country and leave their urban hellholes to the rioting masses.  Within a month the rioting masses will have all frozen and or starve to death.
Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
  • Reputation: +651/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2016, 06:48:39 PM »
DUmmies really want a civil war to start and they want a black president to cause it.

Yup, since they hate guns and stuff they'd have LEO and the military fight it for them, MANY, MANY of which would not. It would be a short war for sure
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline Zathras

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3531
  • Reputation: +538/-71
  • This is the way.
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2016, 07:22:51 PM »
Hmm, send in an armed force of the US Government against a group of armed people who believe the same government is overreaching in its application of the laws of this country.

Yeah, that won't end badly at all, will it?

Well, I guess that's why we call them DUmbasses, isn't it?
Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf

If racist dog whistles are meant to be only heard by racists, then it is quite interesting how progressives seem to be the only people who can hear them. - Leonydus Johnson

What makes a good soldier? The ability to fire 3 rounds a minute in any weather. - Major Richard Sharpe

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2016, 07:49:35 PM »
A Governor can State activate the Guard, but King Putt would have to Federalize them first.

....and no, dipshit, Bush did not "change" anything.   :bird:


EDIT:

OblameO would have to declare a Federal Emergency, first.  He has no grounds for such.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2016, 08:00:39 PM by 98ZJUSMC »
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2016, 02:57:45 AM »
Quote
I read, from Title 10, that the President doesn't need authorization from a state to Federalize the Guard in that state.
The RWer says the President has to get permission from the state Governor.

Your friend is right DUmmie.  Sorry...no President can reach down and just go around the Governor. 

Why do you think Eisenhower called in the 101st to escort the Little Rock Nine?

And besides...IMO...if the guard is going to be employed for a situation like this...it's gonna be guys from the 19th or 20th SFG.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2016, 07:25:54 PM »
Why do you think Eisenhower called in the 101st to escort the Little Rock Nine?

Which was also unconstitutional.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29816
  • Reputation: +3337/-248
Re: National Guard Bouncy
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2016, 08:32:27 PM »
So, Bm actually believes that 100-150 guys squatting in an unused, remote Federal building amounts to, "... any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law ..."? And that the State of OR and its Democrat Governor not attempting an armed retaking of the building amounts to, "... the constituted authorities of that State ... fail(ing) or refus(ing) to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection ..."? I don't think even BHO is THAT stupid.

But, hey! Don't like the way Kate Brown is handling the situation? She's a Democrat: deal with it and


:ownit:
If The Vaccine is deadly as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, millions now living would have died.