Not black,sorta queer,part woman Rolex randy goodness.

[Carl]

Not his OP but quite a performance.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027416757

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:04 PM

KittyWampus (49,975 posts)

She Gave A False Address On Her Visa
Guess they don't check little things like that.

Malik came to the U.S. on what is known as a “fiancé” visa, which allows an American fiancé to petition for his or her partner’s temporary entry before marriage. For the visa application, the address she listed in her Pakistani hometown, ABC News discovered today, does not exist. Malik received a her Green Card this summer, U.S. officials said.


http://abcnews.go.com/International/female-san-bernardino-shooter-tashfeen-malik/story?id=35589386
10
      
   

Response to KittyWampus (Original post)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:07 PM

saturnsring (762 posts)
2. so much for our screening process

Response to saturnsring (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:10 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
4. Wrong

Response to KittyWampus (Reply #7)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:16 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
8. Did you believe the screening process for refugees and what this person went thru

are the same?

Even if they were, and I would doubt it, I am not willing to refuse admission to tens of thousands of innocents just because one or two may be killers.

You may be willing to do that, others here, not me.

Response to randys1 (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:19 PM

KittyWampus (49,975 posts)
11. I think the screening process for ANYONE should be sufficient that a false address

would initiate more scrutiny.

Don't you?

Response to KittyWampus (Reply #11)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:20 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
12. I think most Brown people are harmless and I am not that worried about it.

Not no not most of course what I of course was trying to say was brown people are not the problem even though that seems to be who many are worried about

The race card,how profound...did you think of it all on yourself?

Response to cwydro (Reply #26)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:32 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
34. The fear here seems to be focused on Brown people, so I was merely pointing

out that Brown people arent the problem

Response to LittleBlue (Reply #16)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:23 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
18. So you are saying that if 2 out of 20,000 refugees are killers, say no to all?

Yeah, I will never agree with you on that one.

Get rid of the guns and you wouldnt have to worry, BTW

Response to randys1 (Reply #18)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:24 PM

KittyWampus (49,975 posts)
19. they also made pipe bombs.

Response to KittyWampus (Reply #22)

Fri Dec 4, 2015, 07:27 PM

randys1 (13,295 posts)
24. Someone here was, if not you then I apologize

I think borders are stupid, by the way

Cool,then you won`t mind me helping myself to all your Rolex watches. 

[Karin]

Oh let me have a few! 

"Brown people."      There's just something so offensive in that. 

[Maverick1987]

Rolex Randy could have his own sub-forum here in The Dumpster

I also believe that I had a better chance of finding at least some middle ground with the late Syed Farook than this ransys1 tool

[miskie]

So, the same Rolex Randy who had no problem freaking out because he accidentally made his real identity as a white, male, watch collector known (he made a few ninja lawyer threats, IIRC) now thinks borders are stupid, and he has no problem with immigrants falsifying identity data.

I suppose matters of privacy and security only matter when Randy feels that his may be 'threatened'.

[SVPete]

randys1 (13,295 posts)
8. Did you believe the screening process for refugees and what this person went thru

are the same?

Even if they were, and I would doubt it, I am not willing to refuse admission to tens of thousands of innocents just because one or two may be killers.

You may be willing to do that, others here, not me.

So, rr1 (RolexRandy1), does this mean you have an vacant room in your nice home there in Eureka? Or maybe next door to you?

rr1's probably pretty safe there in an almost remote corner of CA. I wonder how he'd take it if he knew unvetted refugees - many of whom virulently hate gays - would be settled next door to him.

[jb2u11]

So it's OK if a certain percentage of "brown people" are terrorists and intend to kill as many of us as possible, we should still let them in.  But gun owners should all have their rights taken away because a certain percentage of them might shoot someone?

[Patriot Guard Rider]

So it's OK if a certain percentage of "brown people" are terrorists and intend to kill as many of us as possible, we should still let them in.  But gun owners should all have their rights taken away because a certain percentage of them might shoot someone?

Damn, you're starting to think like a DUmmie. May I suggest a month off from the internetwebs, lots of wine and a quiet beach to get your head on straight.

[CollectivismMustDie]

Even if they were, and I would doubt it, I am not willing to refuse admission to tens of thousands of innocents just because one or two may be killers.

But you'd deny people gun rights because 1 or 2 might be killers. Fool.

If you're trying to be the next doug bulna, You're going to have to surpass 'remote in the roof rafters for retards', but don't worry, you're getting close.


CMD

[Patriot Guard Rider]

But you'd deny people gun rights because 1 or 2 might be killers. Fool.

If you're trying to be the next doug bulna, You're going to have to surpass 'remote in the roof rafters for retards', but don't worry, you're getting close.


CMD

Part of the plan. Let one or two in who are killers, and when they kill, the offensive against legal, law abiding gun owners ramps up.

[Maverick1987]

So it's OK if a certain percentage of "brown people" are terrorists and intend to kill as many of us as possible, we should still let them in.  But gun owners should all have their rights taken away because a certain percentage of them might shoot someone?

[randys1] Yes [/randys1]