Proglodytes insist on treating acts by organized groups of Muslims drawing impetus from Muslim texts as the acts of lone individuals. They resent the portrayal of acts of groups of Muslims acting as Muslims as being such.
Conversely, whenever a person attacks an abortion clinic - and the events are years apart as opposed to the atrocities committed daily by Muslims - they do so without textual impetus as far as Christian canon is concerned. Yet, Proglodytes are determined to portray these acts as the base starting point of all Christians.
Moreover, if Proglodytes ever moved passed their "clump of cells" mantra and considered the fetus to be a person the acts perpetrated by those who attack abortion clinics would be in accord with the tactics Proglodytes gleefully advocate against "banksters" and other disfavored groups.
Proglodytes are NOT creatures of principle. They act solely on fleeting acts of outrage that carry them from one controversy to the next without examination of any overarching moral or ethical code. For all their pretense about caring and wanting a better world at the end of the day there is only one variable that carries any consistent currency among the Proglodyte horde:
POWER
Abortion? A call for power against white, Christian males
Banksters? A call for power against the wealthy...and probably white...and probably male...and probably a member of the local church
Racism? A call for power against whites.
Patriarchy? A call for power against males.
Atheism? (in Proglodyte terms) A call for power against Christians...who are presumably white and male
Multiculturalism? A call for power against - you guessed it - white, Christian patriarchy
Christianity? A call for power against white patriacrchy
So why all the cries for power?
Because they don't have power or they want to give power.
They aren't rich and/or powerful but they are convinced that they deserve to be (think: Omaha Steve and most of the horde).
Or, conversely, they are rich and/or powerful and are NOT convinced they deserve to be (think: randys1 or kpete).
What happens when you "deserve" power but don't have it?
You assume the world is unfair...or worse...someone else has unfairly stolen it from you.
So they spend their time demanding power (or demanding power be given to others) instead of doing anything that makes them actually worthy of that power.
Why feed the poor (or teach the poor to feed themselves) when you can just demand others who "unfairly" have more money contribute "their fair share"?
Besides, if the poor could feed themselves then they wouldn't need Proglodytes.
But everyone should need Proglodytes.
Because Proglodytes deserve power and anything else is unfair and if you don't agree then you're unfair and they don't have to listen to you because they deserve the power and you don't because you're unfair....
Yeah. It creates a feedback loop on itself. Back in the days when humans still studied logic (read: white and/or Christian and/or patriarchal) it was known as question begging.
