http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027361591Oh my.
It's about time truemud did something useful in life.
trumad (40,164 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:36 AM
Can I be targeted?
I feel so left out.
Should I just post an Op saying. "I am told I am being targeted?"
Will that suffice---I mean I have no proof that I am---but I do have a sneaky suspicion that maybe I am.
That would be so cool to be targeted.
((((((((((BREAKING NEWS!)))))))))))))))
I just received information from an unnamed source confirming that indeed I am being targeted! This appears credible.
polly7 (15,761 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:38 AM
1. Has anyone told you you were being targeted?
trumad (40,164 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:38 AM
3. Just a suspicion.
No proof---just a suspicion.
polly7 (15,761 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:39 AM
5. Then you're probably not.
And why would it be cool? Cali was targeted, she's alert stalked on every post she makes, I imagine, and can't post again for awhile. You had a whole group (actually, it consisted of all those over there - what a coinky-dink!) sympathizing when you were out, it's supposed to be different for anyone else though?
demmiblue (7,267 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:38 AM
2. Making fun of Omaha Steve... classy.
trumad (40,164 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:39 AM
7. Huh?
Nope---I stand with OS. I want to be targeted just like him.
I just have no proof that I am being targeted.
And oops, the big guy loses again:
Blue_Adept (1,645 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:43 AM
13. Jury Results
On Thu Nov 19, 2015, 08:40 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Can I be targeted?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027361591
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
If the hosts are not going to shut down all these meta threads (from both "sides"), perhaps a jury will do it. It violates SOP, but it is also "disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate."
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 19, 2015, 08:43 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yeah, plus I didn't think copycat threads were a thing in GD. And, hey, if you don't what the crap you are doing your little Clinton website being brought here, the answer would be to, I don't know, maybe stop doing that crap. I realize certain rooms are now hidden which only really confirms that what is being done there doesn't want to be seen.
Rather than do this passive-aggressive stuff, how about you denounce the bad stuff that's being done on other sites for those you support. You know, just like you always say Sanders supporters don't do.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I thought I heard a waahmbulance.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'm not the jury member you're looking for. Good luck, maybe your frivolous alert will be successful.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This whole thread is silly but not worth alerting on.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
William769 (46,025 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 09:54 AM
23. ROFLMFAO!
<<<agrees with my good friend Wills ^^^
mopinko (44,843 posts) Thu Nov 19, 2015, 10:25 AM
30. seems juror #2 has some credible evidence for you.
funny i dont even post that much any more, but i still have my fans in low places.
i live in fear.
<<<thinks Big Mo's just pulling legs here.
