Turbineguy (20,622 posts)
6. The original documents went missing. Pinched from the file. The ones used were reconstructed by the Secretary based on her memory. This was never in question
Hadn't heard this bit of ludicrosity before. before moving onto it's most glaring points of stupidity, I would point out that it bears some analogy to the so-called
Downing Street Memo. As I understand/remember the story, somehow some reporter got ahold of this secret memo about a conference in which British officials agreed to go along with Bush's exaggeration of then current intel. The reporter then ... re-typed the memo and destroyed the original, and then released its purported text. As in, "Trust me, this is genuine! I didn't pull it out of my arse!"
Anyway, back to the story at hand ...
So, decades after the fact a secretary noticed that a document she had typed was missing. Rather the typing a dated memo concerning the discovery and a summary of the original document's contents, the secretary forged a new document, recalled perfectly the original contents despite the passage of decades, using a modern word processing program, made multiple errors in the formatting, made photocopies of photocopies of photocopies of ... of photocopies to make the forgery look old, and passed off the forgery as real? To a known gadfly known to be a hater of the Bush family (I know,
"What's his DU name?" If he's still alive, of course)?
That's so stupid that Tg's computer should have refused to post it!