I Will Never Forgive G.W.Bush

[CC27]

Star Member global1 (13,008 posts)

I Will Never Forgive G.W.Bush And His Administration For 9/11.....


I find it hard to watch these 9/11 memorials. I can't imagine how hard it is for BushCo to watch or participate in any aspect of these memorials. They let it happen on their watch. They had warnings. They should have been more prepared. They weren't.

How any person or group even gives a forum to any of BushCo's administration is beyond me. And Jeb saying that his brother protected us - is beyond belief.

And we want to elect another Bush to this highest office? That's incredulous.

BLAH BLAH BLAH.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027202666

[BannedFromDU]

     "That's incredulous." - another malaprop from The Smartest People on the Internet.

     And I challenge any DUmmy to be honest about how they would have reacted to the following headline:

     "U.S. DOT orders many airplanes grounded and extra security measures applied to all Middle Eastern travelers in response to recent bin Laden threats"

     You people would have Lost. Your. Shit. if anything like that happened. You don't want breathalyzers in cars because it might give even one false positive.

     But, then again, that's why you're all worthless, weak, and penniless: you're stupid and you lie.



ps - President Bush is leading a life of comfort, luxury, and serenity. He doesn't know you exist. In fact, you pretty much don't exist, anyway.

[GOBUCKS]

I Will Never Forgive G.W.Bush

The only American who can reasonably say that is Scooter Libby.

[FlaGator]

I can never forgive Bill Clinton for not dealing with Osama Bin Laden when he had the opportunity. I look at all these 9/11 retrospectives and I just wonder how different the world would be if Bin Laden had been locked away in some secret secure hell hole instead of roaming around Afghanistan.

[samspade]

I can never forgive Bill Clinton for not dealing with Osama Bin Laden when he had the opportunity. I look at all these 9/11 retrospectives and I just wonder how different the world would be if Bin Laden had been locked away in some secret secure hell hole instead of roaming around Afghanistan.

I read during the Clinton administration Pelosi and others agreed Saddam was a threat.  Clinton was offered Bin Laden and refused.  Clinton then proceeded to limit intelligence between agencies.

https://www.reddit.com/comments/1wwsq/democrats_who_said_saddam_had_wmds/

http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2011/05/02/bill-clinton-could-have-seized-osma-bin-laden-in-1996/

In 1995, while America’s intelligence agencies were still investigating al Qaeda's 1993 terrorist bombing of the World Trade Center, the Clinton administration strengthened FISA to a degree that was unprecedented. Specifically, Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick called for increased restrictions on information-sharing between intelligence (CIA) and law-enforcement (FBI) agencies. In a 1995 memo to then-FBI Director Louis Freeh and U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White, titled “Instructions on Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations,” Gorelick wrote the following:


http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=182

[Ptarmigan]

Star Member global1 (13,008 posts)

I Will Never Forgive G.W.Bush And His Administration For 9/11.....


I find it hard to watch these 9/11 memorials. I can't imagine how hard it is for BushCo to watch or participate in any aspect of these memorials. They let it happen on their watch. They had warnings. They should have been more prepared. They weren't.

How any person or group even gives a forum to any of BushCo's administration is beyond me. And Jeb saying that his brother protected us - is beyond belief.

And we want to elect another Bush to this highest office? That's incredulous.

Still bitter about the 2000 Election, eh? 

[SVPete]

Still bitter about the 2000 Election, eh? 

And for 2004 ...  and for winning Texas' gubernatorial elections in 1994 (against Ann Richards, grrrrrrr!) and 1998 ... and for leaving the WH voluntarily and under his own power ... and for living in freedom in TX ... IOW for existing.

[obumazombie]

And for 2004 ...  and for winning Texas' gubernatorial elections in 1994 (against Ann Richards, grrrrrrr!) and 1998 ... and for leaving the WH voluntarily and under his own power ... and for living in freedom in TX ... IOW for existing.

Let's not forget how mad the primitives, DUmmies, and libs were when the "fake but accurate" National Guard documents "forged" onto the scene...

"You Can't Handle the Truth!!!"
 ---A Few Good Men.

Apparently former CBS producer Mary Mapes can't handle the truth at least according to her portrayal by actress Cate Blanchett in the newly released movie trailer for the upcoming fictional movie Truth.
I say fictional because Mapes in the film somehow maintains the truth of her story about George W. Bush getting favorable treatment in the Texas Air National Guard based on documents that were proven to be forgeries.

Let us now watch Blanchett perform a comedy turn as Mary Mapes in the trailer:

MARY MAPES:
Our story was about whether the President fulfilled his service.
Nobody wants to talk about that.

They want to talk about fonts and forgeries and they hope to God the truth gets lost in the scrum!

Yeah, and who initially played up those documents that Mapes subsequently downplayed by pretending people had a weird obsession about "fonts and forgeries?"
Why Dan Rather himself on 60 Minutes II who featured those documents to validate the story produced by Mary Mapes.

Over ten years have passed and yet Mapes is still unable to reveal valid documents to prove her case.
Instead she continues to pretend in both her book and now in the film that the "truth" of her fiction is valid despite the fact that her documents proved to be fake.

It's also laughable when a questioner tells Mapes they're talking about "bringing your politics into your reporting," and she insists "I did nothing of the kind!"



So who would be crazy enough to buy into this absurd premise of "fake but accurate?"
Well it looks like a number of MSM outlets are willing to be fact-free enablers starting with Newsweek as you can see in their review:

The film follows the public downfall of the well-known news anchor Rather as he, alongside Mapes, reveal the details of President George W. Bush's Vietnam military record on a 2004 CBS 60 Minutes show.

They found "internal military memos" that allegedly belonged to Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, Bush's squadron commander.
According to the CBS team, the documents showed strings were pulled for Bush, the son of President George H. W. Bush, to join the National Guard so he could avoid fighting in Vietnam.

The film portrays the fallout from the broadcast, in which the legitimacy of the "Killian Documents" were disputed.

Disputed?
There is no dispute.

Those documents upon which 60 Minutes II and Mary Mapes based their story were proven to be forgeries.
Newsweek, however, has shown us the path many in the MSM will probably take in reviewing the film by downplaying whether the documents were legit or not when in reality the entire truth of the story is based on their legitimacy.

One fortunate aspect of the fictional film Truth is that the main character seems to be Mary Mapes since Dan Rather as played by Robert Redford is very painful to watch. He appears to be held together with duct tape and wires and could collapse at any moment.

full article...



http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/pj-gladnick/2015/09/24/mary-mapes-cant-handle-truth-truth-trailer#sthash.uHeUMwLK.dpuf

[jukin]

So Clinton has no responsibility for 9/11 a mere 9 months into a late starting Bush presidency but Bush is still responsible 7 years later for the FUed economy under Obama?

Cognitive dissonance, another trait of very high IQ people. Who knew?

[samspade]

BLAH BLAH BLAH.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027202666

IF Clinton had dealt with the bombers  the first time instead of calling it a police action while working to stymie the gathering of intel perhaps the terrorists would not have been embolden.  Instead he chose to stop interagency cooperation.

[SVPete]

IF Clinton had dealt with the bombers  the first time instead of calling it a police action while working to gather intel perhaps the terrorists would not have been embolden.  Instead he chose to stop interagency cooperation.

The Ds have simply, consistently, refused to take terrorism seriously. Not WJC, not Congressional Ds, not BHO, not HRC. They view terrorist acts as crimes against whatever individuals are directly affected, not against our entire nation and its economy. E.G. A-Q's purposes for the 9/11 attacks did not end when the dust settled after the towers fell. Their biggest purpose was the 10s, 100s, or even 1000s of billions of $$ the attack cost the US economy.