Author Topic: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.  (Read 2424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« on: September 10, 2015, 06:59:00 PM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027158593

Quote
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:48 PM

AngryAmish (23,118 posts)

‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/no-blacks-is-not-a-sexual-preference-it-s-racism.html

Debates around “sexual racism,” as researchers have labeled it, are particularly heated within the gay community, although it is certainly a source of controversy in heterosexual circles as well. It is also an argument that could soon be settled by emerging sociological research.
A new Australian study published in Archives of Sexual Behavior entitled “Is Sexual Racism Really Racism?” suggests that the answer to that question is probably “yes.” Sex researchers Denton Callander, Christy Newman, and Martin Holt asked over 2,000 gay and bisexual Australian men how they felt about race and dating through an online survey. These men also completed a region-specific version of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI), a standard survey instrument that measures attitudes on race and diversity.

After putting these two data sets together, the trend was clear: “Sexual racism… is closely associated with generic racist attitudes, which challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference.”

 :retards:

I wonder if not black,half queer Rolex randy takes some dark meat in the can?

Offline zeitgeist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6238
  • Reputation: +429/-44
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2015, 07:19:06 PM »
Little innuendo 'eh?  Guess that is why he is a Randy One.
 {ran·dy  (răn′dÄ“)}
adj. ran·di·er, ran·di·est
1.
a. Desirous of sexual activity.
b. Sexually aroused.
2. Scots Ill-mannered.

 :rofl:
< watch this space for coming distractions >

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2015, 07:33:48 PM »
"Sexual racism"- so now taste is redefined as racism.

I am partial to redheads with pale skin, and big breasts. The number of black women who have all three is zero. By not having sex with black women, I am a racist.

Sounds like the kind of stupidity we have come to expect from Skins' Island.
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2015, 07:42:24 PM »
Quote
Response to arcane1 (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 10, 2015, 08:12 PM

Marr (18,388 posts)
3. I expect they'd show something similar. I read an article recently about online dating apps

and rejection rates of various groups (young, old, a variety of racial/ethnic types, etc.). Some had markedly wider acceptance, among not only their own specific group, but others. Other groups had notably higher rejection rates. IIRC, black women and asian men got the worst of it. White men and asian women got the widest selection of positive receptions.

It's an interesting topic, and while I definitely think it's racism, it's one that's also oddly hard to condemn people for. I mean, it would be awfully hard to call say, a black woman, a racist for not wanting to date white men. I've also known lots of women who wouldn't date men of certain ethnicities (specifically, the ones I knew had refused men from Mexico, and parts of the Middle East) because of the tendencies for certain attitudes towards women that they'd noted in the past from men hailing from those places.

And while generalizing such attitudes certainly seems unfair to me, we're talking about a setting where the pool is for all intents and purposes infinite, so they figured they weren't losing anything by cutting out whole swaths of the population in that way.

Tells you all you need to know about the race card.

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2015, 07:48:16 PM »
Quote
Marr

It's an interesting topic, and while I definitely think it's racism, it's one that's also oddly hard to condemn people for. I mean, it would be awfully hard to call say, a black woman, a racist for not wanting to date white men.

You chickenshit. If it's racist for white men to not have sex with black women, then it's racist for black women to not have sex with white men. Furthermore, it's also homophobic for straight men to not suck cock, and heterophobic for dykes to not have sex with men.

Or not - at least not in the real world.

Maybe you're just a stupid ****ing coward looking for something, anything, to feign outrage over.
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline DUmpsterDiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1605
  • Reputation: +139/-33
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2015, 08:12:55 PM »
White women going black ain't coming Back.  And no, it's not a matter of time ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYMFa399BbM

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2015, 08:37:03 PM »
Damn cracka won't give a brotha a reach-around..  :rofl:

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2015, 08:44:31 PM »
Damn cracka won't give a brotha a reach-around..  :rofl:
:-)
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2015, 08:50:06 PM »
White women going black ain't coming Back.  And no, it's not a matter of time ...




A girl who went to High School with my daughter is a single Mom living with her Mom, at the end of my street, with 2 mulatto kids.
They are good looking kids, but they are reminders of a big mistake she made thinking the father would be a father.
Maybe she has no regrets, but in her shoes I can't help but think I would.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2015, 08:50:17 PM »
Quote
It's an interesting topic, and while I definitely think it's racism,  ::)  it's one that's also oddly hard to condemn people for. I mean, it would be awfully hard to call say, a black woman, a racist for not wanting to date white men. I've also known lots of women who wouldn't date men of certain ethnicities (specifically, the ones I knew had refused men from Mexico, and parts of the Middle East) because of the tendencies for certain attitudes towards women that they'd noted in the past from men hailing from those places.

By your own rules, you are a knuckle dragging racist.   :clap:
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23544
  • Reputation: +2473/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2015, 09:10:11 PM »
I think black, Latino, Asian and Semitic women are hawt.

I'm also a raging conservative.

So am I racist or not, Proglodytes.
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Ptarmigan

  • Bunny Slayer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24108
  • Reputation: +1020/-226
  • God Hates Bunnies
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #11 on: September 10, 2015, 09:11:44 PM »
 :???: :wtf2:  :mental:
Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.
-Napoleon Bonaparte

Allow enemies their space to hate; they will destroy themselves in the process.
-Lisa Du

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2015, 09:16:55 PM »
Quote
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:48 PM

AngryAmish (23,118 posts)

‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/no-blacks-is-not-a-sexual-preference-it-s-racism.html

Debates around “sexual racism,” as researchers have labeled it, are particularly heated within the gay community, although it is certainly a source of controversy in heterosexual circles as well. It is also an argument that could soon be settled by emerging sociological research.
A new Australian study published in Archives of Sexual Behavior entitled “Is Sexual Racism Really Racism?” suggests that the answer to that question is probably “yes.” Sex researchers Denton Callander, Christy Newman, and Martin Holt asked over 2,000 gay and bisexual Australian men how they felt about race and dating through an online survey. These men also completed a region-specific version of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI), a standard survey instrument that measures attitudes on race and diversity.

After putting these two data sets together, the trend was clear: “Sexual racism… is closely associated with generic racist attitudes, which challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference.”

The sad thing is somebody paid for this study.   :mental:
Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline Mr Mannn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14885
  • Reputation: +2648/-276
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #13 on: September 10, 2015, 09:23:00 PM »
I would love to date Halle Berry. But I think only morons are attracted to Black Lives Matter.
one is a preference, the other is a fact. Neither is racist.

Offline CollectivismMustDie

  • American
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4057
  • Reputation: +1588/-42
  • (D)Ummie nightmare.
Re: ‘No Blacks’ Is Not a Sexual Preference. It's Racism.
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2015, 12:40:07 AM »
I think black, Latino, Asian and Semitic women are hawt.

I'm also a raging conservative.

So am I racist or not, Proglodytes.

Thats scheduled to be updated in the next revision of white privilege, I'm pretty sure.


CMD
"Be not intimidated... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

Hillary Clinton will never be the President of the United States.