And that it turns out that this BLM rep is a fundy, makes it even worse.
Could some one interpret? Is she saying:
A. The BLM female is one of the universal bogeymen, a "Fundamentalist"?
B. The BLM female was funded by
Tsaritsa CHILL or George Soros?
C. The BLM female was funded by the VRWC?
D. The BLM female is a trust-fund 1%er?
Whatever
her meaning, I think "B." is probable, and "D." quite possible.