Welcome to The Conservative Cave©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Star Member MannyGoldstein (33,001 posts) So let me get this straight...Hillary Clinton claims that using her own unsecure private email account was OK, in part because she sent no classified information and thus her emails didn't need to be secure. Yesterday, the NY Times claimed that two inspectors general of the State Department asked the DOJ to open a criminal investigation on Hillary Clinton because she did indeed send classified information using that her own private email account. Today I'm told that the reality is totally different: yes, the inspectors found that 10% of 40 emails sampled from from Hillary's private account did contain classified information that is illegal to send over private email. But they don't know if Hillary knew the info was classified. So it looks like roughly 10% of Hillary's private emails contained classified info which should not have been sent using private email, but we don't know if Hillary did this on purpose. Whew, no problem there. So if Hillary wins our primaries, she'll have a great answer when her Republican points out that as SoS she sent thousands of personal emails containing national secrets, she'll have a great answer: "I didn't know they were state secrets" OK. (Not to mention that using a single private account set up by Goddess-knows-who for all of her State Department and personal business is, on its face, about the craziest thing I ever heard of, but I understand that I'm one of a very few who feels this way.)
Skins will not like this at all.http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251473481
Oh, Hillary has a ton of baggage and if somebody can come along and out maneuver her then Dem leaders will let it happen like they did with Dear Leader in 08.But Bernie will never, ever, in a billion years, be that somebody..
Recursion (39,975 posts)31. Why did you add "unsecure" there?Is there any evidence the email server did not meet CCB standards?
Recursion (39,975 posts)35. Configuration Control Board. The government regulations about computer systems.They control how servers and software must be set up for US Government use, to control both lifecycle costs and security. Since you called it "unsecure" you seem to be implying that it did not meet those standards.
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site
35. Configuration Control Board. The government regulations about computer systems.They control how servers and software must be set up for US Government use, to control both lifecycle costs and security. Since you called it "unsecure" you seem to be implying that it did not meet those standards.
Being the server wasn't in any way connected to govt controlled switches and routers automatically means it fails DUmbass. Because Clinton's server could be connected to from the internet at large without passing through any govt property first also means it fails. Compliance isn't a matter of sticking some virus checker software on the box and hoping for the best.
What? You mean adding Kaspersky to her server wasn't enough!!!
