When is child molestation funny? When liberals say so.

[obumazombie]

I wonder if he is a double agent provocateur.
You know, one of those community agitator thingies that with the one other quality of being half black makes you qualified to be president.

[BannedFromDU]

Actually, when Buzz posted, "a woman-drugging, serial rapist," he was referring to Cosby. I think he has a point. I don't remember WJC having drugged his victims.

BFDU's avatar is intended to be serious. My take - which BFDU can confirm or correct or not - is the double-standard of the MSM, who have been running wild (perhaps correctly) with the claims against Cosby, but suppressed and mocked the claims against WJC. I don't know of a way to make that double-standard and partisan cover-up funny. And would not seek one.

     My avatar is deadly serious. The DUmp has decided that since Bill Cosby has admonished the black community to actually be a community and not a fatherless, soulless suck on society, he is guilty of whatever claims of rape exist against him.

     And he is probably guilty of some, if not most, and indeed perhaps ALL of those accusations. Clinton, on the other hand, is KNOWN to be a womanizing, raping, scumbag asshole, but he is somehow granted immunity by the DUmp while he engages in exactly the behavior they claim to be against.  THE CLINTON FOUNDATION? Can someone tell me what the Clinton Foundation does other than peddle influence?

     

[BannedFromDU]

Well, SVPete, I asked him a question, and he could have answered it the way you did rather than the ****-you-ladened rant he chose. My reaction to your post is, "I can see that." My reaction to his post: "Oh yeah -- this is the Cave where verbal abuse is king."

meh.

     While I am capable of holding my own at the highest level of repartee, you can nevertheless suck my cock. You DUmmies may bury your heads in the sand over the Clintons, but when you bring that snide bullshit over here, I'm going to smack you around. Answer questions? I don't answer questions? Here's a few questions for YOU, troll mother****er:

• What would you say about the email server and its deletion if Cankles was a Republican?
• What would your opinion of Benghazi be if Clinton was a Republican?
• What would you say about the emerging trail of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation if it was the Bush Foundation?

I'll stop there, since your nuts have been bequeathed to Clintonite Skinner and in fact you're probably getting paid to come agitate over here. You couldn't answer a question honestly to save your own skin. No, it's worse than that: you couldn't answer a question honestly to save a CLINTON'S skin, which is far more valuable to you than your own.

You liberals have exactly one rote response to the Clinton patronage machine: you think it's OK because you're sure Bush was worse. That makes you as craven and thuggish as the Clintons themselves.

The Clinton Family is absolutely a crime syndicate enabled by the bruised knees of you and your kind, Buzz Clik. I hope Bill treats you better than he did Paula Jones. **** you.

[BuzzClik]

While I am capable of holding my own at the highest level of repartee..

Let's find out if that's true...

...you can nevertheless suck my cock.

Oh, bad start. I don't think that qualifies as "repartee" at all.

You DUmmies may bury your heads in the sand over the Clintons, but when you bring that snide bullshit over here, I'm going to smack you around. Answer questions? I don't answer questions?

Yeah, well, you've got it all wrong. I know that all you Fox spooge swallowers are absolutely convinced that Clinton is a rapist, and everything points to Cosby being a rapist. So I asked the question: when is your (double rapist) avatar funny? I said never. Instead of simply saying, "Yeah, never!" you went completely postal. Not exactly high level repartee, you think?

I don't answer questions? Here's a few questions for YOU, troll mother****er:

• What would you say about the email server and its deletion if Cankles was a Republican?
• What would your opinion of Benghazi be if Clinton was a Republican?
• What would you say about the emerging trail of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation if it was the Bush Foundation?

Okay:

• Same thing I'd say about Clinton: What the hell is wrong with you? The only thing we can assume is guilt.
• Same thing I think now: Only a total moron would continue to pursue this when it's clear there is nothing else to be learned.
• Same thing as #1: What the hell is wrong with you? The only thing we can assume is guilt.

This is where you call me a f***ing liar because you know a helluva lot less than you think you do.

I'll stop there, since your nuts have been bequeathed to Clintonite Skinner and in fact you're probably getting paid to come agitate over here. You couldn't answer a question honestly to save your own skin. No, it's worse than that: you couldn't answer a question honestly to save a CLINTON'S skin, which is far more valuable to you than your own.

Yeah, good call. As I was saying about your knowledge bank... empty.

Well, it was nice having this repartee with you.

Just think if you could combine all that anger and vulgarity with some actual knowledge, and then focus it on something worthwhile: you might actually amount to something. 

[Carl]

Yeah, well, you've got it all wrong. I know that all you Fox spooge swallowers

Nice homphobic insult buzzy. 

[BannedFromDU]

Let's find out if that's true...
Oh, bad start. I don't think that qualifies as "repartee" at all.
Yeah, well, you've got it all wrong. I know that all you Fox spooge swallowers are absolutely convinced that Clinton is a rapist, and everything points to Cosby being a rapist. So I asked the question: when is your (double rapist) avatar funny? I said never. Instead of simply saying, "Yeah, never!" you went completely postal. Not exactly high level repartee, you think?
Okay:

• Same thing I'd say about Clinton: What the hell is wrong with you? The only thing we can assume is guilt.
• Same thing I think now: Only a total moron would continue to pursue this when it's clear there is nothing else to be learned.
• Same thing as #1: What the hell is wrong with you? The only thing we can assume is guilt.

This is where you call me a f***ing liar because you know a helluva lot less than you think you do.
Yeah, good call. As I was saying about your knowledge bank... empty.

Well, it was nice having this repartee with you.

Just think if you could combine all that anger and vulgarity with some actual knowledge, and then focus it on something worthwhile: you might actually amount to something. 

     You aren't worth a pointed response, which of course you (in Clintonian fashion) will mistake for defeat. I will simply say that if you, Buzz Clik, applied the same DU scrutiny to the Clintons that it applies to the least Republican, there is no way you could possibly support anyone in that crime syndicate.

     The mere fact that you came here in the first place is a tacit admission that Cankles is dirty: if she and her sodomite rapist woman-beating husband were clean, and if she had any intention of articulating a set of policies that would actually help a typical DUmmy's life, you would have in your heart the fulfillment you seek from your experience here. 
 
     But you know (and would never admit) that she and her scumbag rape-and-deny husband would, in TorchTheWitch imagery, wipe their asses with you and your brethren, unless of course you have at least a half million to spare. Do you? People like you care about Election Day and how you feel that night. People like me, many of whom I vouchsafe are reading this post, are more concerned with their prospects every other day. Do you seriously think Clinton is a populist? Really? If she's a populist, can you tell me who in the United States has benefited from her Foundation? Feel free to exclude its employees.

     I have a vague memory of you coming around in years past, and I seem to recall you were a decent sort back then. I am sorry you've been infected by the Clinton disease, which turns to shit everything in its path. In this instance, your brain.

     And I reiterate that you can suck my cock.

[BuzzClik]

BannedFromDU,

You haven't read a word I wrote; or, if you did, you chose to ignore every word. That's not my fault, but it tells me a lot about where you and I will be going from here.

On a board like this when in the minority, you can find out who the worthy adversaries are by pushing them really hard. You don't break the rules but give these guys something to think about ... or not think about. Their response tells you everything you need to know.

You've left me to evaluate someone who screams and yells and insults and denigrates and never bothers to reply to questions or read responses. It's pretty simple from here.

[Carl]

BannedFromDU,

You haven't read a word I wrote; or, if you did, you chose to ignore every word. That's not my fault, but it tells me a lot about where you and I will be going from here.

On a board like this when in the minority, you can find out who the worthy adversaries are by pushing them really hard. You don't break the rules but give these guys something to think about ... or not think about. Their response tells you everything you need to know.

You've left me to evaluate someone who screams and yells and insults and denigrates and never bothers to reply to questions or read responses. It's pretty simple from here.

Need a mirror buzzy?

You are the last one to accuse others of that,jackass.

[BannedFromDU]

BannedFromDU,

You haven't read a word I wrote; or, if you did, you chose to ignore every word. That's not my fault, but it tells me a lot about where you and I will be going from here.

On a board like this when in the minority, you can find out who the worthy adversaries are by pushing them really hard. You don't break the rules but give these guys something to think about ... or not think about. Their response tells you everything you need to know.

You've left me to evaluate someone who screams and yells and insults and denigrates and never bothers to reply to questions or read responses. It's pretty simple from here.

     Dude, you're not cute, funny, insightful, or clever. You're just a jagoff DU Clintonite. In years past I would have engaged you to your heart's content, but my patience for hypocrites and liberal internet gadflies is at zero. I am not like you. I do not derive personal satisfaction from the identity of the person in the White House. I see problems that need to be solved, and I see DUmmies ready to exacerbate each of them just so they can feel that have ammunition for their daily scrum on internet message boards.  My aim for my fellow man is higher than merely wishing that he gets more money in his unemployment check. Yet that is what you will get from any of the Democrats up for consideration.

     That's it; that's all I have to say to you and to people like you forever. 

     

[obumazombie]

Quote from Buzzy...

Same thing I think now: Only a total moron would continue to pursue this when it's clear there is nothing else to be learned

When a lib says "clear" they mean the vista has been totally obscured by lib propaganda and rhetoric.

Don't you remember when the object of your adoration and unearned loyalty said Benghazi was because of a video ?
Or, are you going to stand by that lie, which was known to be a lie, just like everything that Gruber put into your messiah owebuma's mouth was ?

[Movie buff- The Sequel]

Back on topic, this kind of crap is really nothing new for libs.
They love making repulsive, tasteless jokes about rape and molestation when the alleged culprit is a Republican/ conservative, or even just someone who they think they can associate with the right. If someone raises issue with these horrible, tasteless jokes, they accuse the detractor in question of having "No sense of humor."
If it's a leftist accused of rape or molestation, in contrast, nothing that could even vaguely be considered a joke about said leftist is allowed by them, and they either insist that the leftist in question is being framed by the right in an attempt to silence him/ her, or insist it's no big deal.

Liberal TV darling Seth MacFarlane regularly pukes out "jokes" on his shows relating to the rape of women and children, and 'Family Guy' even has not one but two major characters whose sole schtick is making the rape of women and the molestation of children seem funny and amusing (Quagmire and Herbert, respectively). They've even made and sold action figures of those characters, for God's sake! Yep, his shows portray conservatives, Christians, people who smoke, and people who serve in the military as horrible, pure- evil monsters and accuse the tobacco companies of "Morally bankrupting our society," yet simultaneously portray sexual predators as funny and amusing. I am genuinely surprised that there hasn't been more public outcry against MacFarlane and his revolting shows from advocacy/ support groups for victims of sexual assault.
As it says in Isaiah 5:20, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"

[wasp69]

Consistency has never been a major concern of this place.

Like a worthless, cowardly, obtuse **** of a DUmmie could ever lecture someone on "consistency".