Author Topic: Iran's leader says no military inspections will be allowed, news agency reports  (Read 1635 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
(CNN) Iran's Supreme Leader has said the country will not allow any inspections of its military facilities, the official state news agency reported Wednesday.
 
The announcement might set back international efforts to reach an agreement that would assure the world that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons. Any such agreement would rely on international inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities.


http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/20/middleeast/iran-military-inspections/index.html
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline libertybele

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 639
  • Reputation: +50/-21
So...what was the point of the Kerry/Obama/iran negotiations other than to cause more instability in the Middle East and to hamper any progress we've made in the region over the past decade.   
I believe in the United States of America as a government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed, a democracy in a republic, a sovereign Nation of many sovereign States; a perfect union, one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice, and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution, to obey its laws, to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9366
  • Reputation: +1541/-29
So...what was the point of the Kerry/Obama/iran negotiations other than to cause more instability in the Middle East and to hamper any progress we've made in the region over the past decade.

It was all window dressing for the low/no information crowd  to make it look like obama was a leader who singlehandedly stopped the iranians from acquiring The Bomb. 

Those of us with a brain who said it was a bad deal were criticized for being racist because we were not backing obama on this folly.

In the end, the World will suffer for obama's bungling of this deal and failed foreign policy.
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
So...what was the point of the Kerry/Obama/iran negotiations other than to cause more instability in the Middle East and to hamper any progress we've made in the region over the past decade.
Exactly.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
The only thing that can possibly keep Obama from giving away the farm is Iranian intransigence and caprice.  He will give up any principle to make a deal even to the extent we lose ground and Iranians gain in it, just so he can claim a 'Deal' as an 'Accomplishment,' just like Bill Clinton with the Norks.  Our only hope is that the Iranians decide they don't even need a deal for anything and decide to jerk him around, then refuse to sign anything, just to make a fool of him (Too late, Iran, he already beat you to that one).
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Belle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 415
  • Reputation: +42/-16
Tanker:  "He will give up any principle to make a deal even to the extent we lose ground and Iranians gain in it, just so he can claim a 'Deal' as an 'Accomplishment..."
I agree. Obama & Kerry will move forward even if they have to give away the farm.

Years ago I was working as a charge nurse, passing meds, & one of the nsg. assistants excitedly came briskly toward me...."Osama's dead, Al Qaeda can't hurt us anymore."  I smiled  & said something like, wow, great.  She had obviously drunk the kool-aid, but I knew from our dear leader that this was showmanship.

Same with the Iranian deal.  It looks good for Obama & the Dems, will help Hillary going strong & the 47% (probably much higher now with all the immigrants coming thru our open borders) will think that whatever the chosen one says or does, is.

"DLR:  "In the end, the World will suffer for obama's bungling of this deal and failed foreign policy."  We are suffering now, & will continue to do so under Hillary (yes, I think she'll win).  When the deal is done, & Iran's sanctions are lifted, the gush of money will enhance terrorism throughout the world.

He speaks, therefore it is:  "....it was “common sense” to expect that the regime would use it (monies from lifted sanctions) to improve the ailing economy, rather than to step up funding for terrorism or destabilizing activities in the region."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/wh-common-sense-iran-will-use-money-lifted-sanctions-boost-economy
 

Offline RayRaytheSBS

  • "There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
  • Reputation: +200/-13
Why is it I feel like I've time travelled to England in 1938 and just heard Neville Chamberlain announce 'peace in our time'?

Do any of these alleged 'smarterest, brighterest peoples EVER!!!!!!!!!!!ELEBINTY!!!!' even pay attention in history class?
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms”

“The best things in life are beyond money; their price is agony and sweat and devotion ... and the price demanded for the most precious of all things in life is life itself - ultimate cost for perfect value.”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Why is it I feel like I've time travelled to England in 1938 and just heard Neville Chamberlain announce 'peace in our time'?

Do any of these alleged 'smarterest, brighterest peoples EVER!!!!!!!!!!!ELEBINTY!!!!' even pay attention in history class?

They are much better at revising it.
They have never heard of Santayana.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.