Well! Looky there! There is a GoFundMe Account set up for that pizza joint

[obumazombie]

^Heh. Good stuff Marine !

[Ptarmigan]

It would appear that you applied the correct amount of:

How about applying the whole box on a troll. 

I think we should feed trolls to rabbits. A fate worse than death. 

[98ZJUSMC]

It's going over $500k

Question. These donations, are they done? Meaning once they show up that means the money is taken from the contributors account?

Yep... $453k and still rising.

EDIT:
Refreshed it after 4 minutes.  Went up over $4k.   

Question. These donations, are they done? Meaning once they show up that means the money is taken from the contributors account?

Not sure.  My understanding is that it is a debit/credit transaction done at the time of donation, not pledges to be sent later (and forgotten).

[98ZJUSMC]

How about applying the whole box on a troll. 

I think we should feed trolls to rabbits. A fate worse than death. 

Gee, ....that doesn't mean we would have to cut them up into very small pieces, would it?

I hope not....      

[98ZJUSMC]

That paltry $318,000 is almost 1% of the damage just from the Angie's List pullout, which is just a drop in the bucket:

You mean the Corporation?  You know, the ones you pretend to hate?

I was unaware and don't care what religion was being practiced by the owner.  Most Christians correctly find intolerance to be un-Christianly. It was the intolerant attitude that set people off.

If you're trying to sell O'Reilly's war on Christianity to me, it won't go. I'm a Christian and have no loathing of my religion or other Christians.

Sure you do.  You simply refuse to acknowledge it....

or, you're a phucking liar.

Just because you're a narcissistic putz and are still checking these replies:

$465,167 of $200k

http://www.gofundme.com/memoriespizza

Keep clicking this link for updates!  I know you want to.   

[BuzzClik]

I guess we'll have to go slower for libs like you so that an actual thought or idea might sink in before you knee jerk react.
Let's examine the quote in question that you assert is all wrong...

I bolded the part you are being purposely obtuse about..."service in their store".
If they were asked to cater a LGBLT(hold the lettuce) wedding, that would be NOT in their store.

 

Trying to be clever by weaving a very tight web of semantics, but you still whiffed. This is what she said:

"If a gay couple was to come in and they wanted us to to provide pizzas for a wedding, we'd have to say, 'No.'"

"Come in ..." as in come into the store and ask for pizzas for a wedding. Not cater. Just provide pizzas. She never said cater; she did say "if a couple was to come in." How hard is this for you?

And so much anger and attitude! Yet you are still dead wrong.

Now, try again. Re-read everything very closely and see if you can find some way -- any way -- that you could be correct. Misquote me, misquote them, distort the meaning of words. Just do it. It is so important for you to call me stupid that you will stop at nothing. The bottom line remains: she stated without equivocating that she would not serve them pizzas for a gay wedding. She said it. I provided the video of her saying so.

I'm done with you on this little dustup. You've got nothing but anger and unjustifiable hate. It's a lot of anger and hate, but that doesn't win arguments. Now, play to your audience with more empty bravado -- they love it.

[Bad Dog]

Trying to be clever by weaving a very tight web of semantics, but you still whiffed. This is what she said:

"If a gay couple was to come in and they wanted us to to provide pizzas for a wedding, we'd have to say, 'No.'"

"Come in ..." as in come into the store and ask for pizzas for a wedding. Not cater. Just provide pizzas. She never said cater; she did say "if a couple was to come in." How hard is this for you?

And so much anger and attitude! Yet you are still dead wrong.

Now, try again. Re-read everything very closely and see if you can find some way -- any way -- that you could be correct. Misquote me, misquote them, distort the meaning of words. Just do it. It is so important for you to call me stupid that you will stop at nothing. The bottom line remains: she stated without equivocating that she would not serve them pizzas for a gay wedding. She said it. I provided the video of her saying so.

I'm done with you on this little dustup. You've got nothing but anger and unjustifiable hate. It's a lot of anger and hate, but that doesn't win arguments. Now, play to your audience with more empty bravado -- they love it.

The store has never refused service based on race, gender or political persuasion.  She was specifically asked if she would wish to participate in a gay wedding and said she would not.  You have twisted this to give the impression they would discriminate in the course of normal business.

Like Dingy Harry, you are a liar.  As we like to say here, DUmmies lie, they lie all the time.

[98ZJUSMC]

I'm done with you on this little dustup.

I lost.  I'm wrong.  I'm a broken human being.  I'm leaving.

Now, play to your audience with more empty bravado

As stated, you're wrong.  We're the audience, watching the fool entertain us.

[miskie]

$487,825 as of this morning..

[Eupher]

I gotta hand it to Buzzy.

It's a DUmb**** and it regularly comes in to get its ass kicked.

That makes it not only a DUmb****, but a masochistic DUmb****.

We've got a three ring circus going on here! The skyrocketing $$ amount on the gofundme account, the DUmb**** regularly showing its ass, and the DUmb**** having its ass handed to it!

Gotta love it!

 

[Mr Mannn]

$494,746

Buzzy must be truly saddened by the justice of it all.

[landofconfusion80]

$494,746

Buzzy must be truly saddened by the justice of it all.

That's some serious social justice funding right there!

[Big Dog]

Big Dog: This is exactly the kind of knuckledragging, neanderthal mindset I was talking about. He has a point to make, but rather than go in for the rhetorical kill, he resorts to juvenile insults.

C'mon, Buzz. This is not Skins' Powder Puff league. We play full-contact ball here.

I am a blue-painted claymore-swinging savage, and happily so; if my blade has no blood on it, the sun won't shine and the grass won't grow. "Knuckledragging neanderthal" is probably the nicest thing you could call me. Even some of our fellow Cavers wince at me from time to time. But the cold steel of my argumentative claymore cleaves collectivist idiocy like a Muslim's knife through the throat of a five year old.

And Skul: You need to understand something quite clearly about liberals -- being called fag/queer/knob gobbler/butt pirate/gerbil felcher/turd burglar is not an insult. Sorry, it just isn't. This is why the Indiana defense of "religious freedom" and/or "Hey! This bill protects rights" falls on deaf ears. We know you.

A technical question: How you felch a gerbil? Their assholes are so tiny.

[Big Dog]

That's some serious social justice funding right there!

When donations break $500,000, I will celebrate the triumph of real social justice - with a good cigar.

Do you like cigars, Buzz? I'm a Rocky Patel man, myself.

Your friend Alex likes good wine, but it wasn't enough to keep her from melting down.

[BuzzClik]

You mean the Corporation?  You know, the ones you pretend to hate?

I hate corporations? Starting when?

[BuzzClik]

I lost.  I'm wrong.  I'm a broken human being.  I'm leaving.

No, I was correct in my original statement: " A backlash develops when this pizza joint refuses service to GBLTs..."

Our dim friend then repeatedly called me a liar. I gave him a video demonstrating for your eyes and ears that I was correct. His response: "You're wrong because they would serve gays in their restaurant."

No, I am correct because they said they would not sell pizzas to gays for a gay wedding. That is exactly and completely "refusing service to GBLTs." Period.

Being a part-time bigot is still bigotry. All the parsing of words and playing of semantic games won't change that.

[BuzzClik]

When donations break $500,000, I will celebrate the triumph of real social justice - with a good cigar.

Cool. No one has ever doubted the ability of the right to put their money where their mouths are. In this case, it's full-on support of discrimination under the guise of religion. I'll have to pass on this one....

Your friend Alex likes good wine, but it wasn't enough to keep her from melting down.

You guys banned her after mustering some phony outrage over a comment she made. Her comment was insulting and totally bad form, but "this isn't Skins powder puff league." I was not at all surprised by her banning.

[67 Rover]

$494,746

Buzzy must be truly saddened by the justice of it all.

I hope they spend a little of that money on Sig P220's or HK 45's for every employee.  Just in case.

[njpines]

And Skul: You need to understand something quite clearly about liberals -- being called fag/queer/knob gobbler/butt pirate/gerbil felcher/turd burglar is not an insult. Sorry, it just isn't. This is why the Indiana defense of "religious freedom" and/or "Hey! This bill protects rights" falls on deaf ears. We know you.

Yes, it is DUmbass, yes it is. One of my brothers is gay and while I love him and would never say I disapprove of his lifestyle, I do. But, then again, he could say the same about me, if he chooses, but he doesn't. He's not one of the gay mafia you all think should rule the world and he doesn't believe in gay marriage AND he's a libertarian/conservative! Guess your head may explode now.

This law has been in effect since Clinton, you idiot. Deal with it.

[Undies]

It's over half-a-million dollars now.  It will be over a million before tomorrow.

Did those filthy ugly-hearted people learn nothing from Chick-Fil-A Appreciation Day?

[BuzzClik]

Yes, it is DUmbass, yes it is.

Let me clarify: having some knuckledragging, rightwing jackass call me "faggot/knobgobbler, etc" in an attempt to piss me off won't work because, although those words are horrific, being gay is not a bad thing. You cannot convince a knuckledragger of that because he/she is convinced that "God Hates Fags", but, then, trying to educate a neanderthal is a waste of time.

[Mr Mannn]

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=101615.0
Here we see a muslin bakery not catering to a gay wedding.
There is no outrage. No boycott. no prosecutions.

The Left is only threatened by Christians standing for their rights. Liberals are hypocrites.

[BuzzClik]

Here's a short quiz I found amusing:

How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Being Threatened in Just 10 Quick Questions

1. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am not allowed to go to a religious service of my own choosing.
B) Others are allowed to go to religious services of their own choosing.

2. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am not allowed to marry the person I love legally, even though my religious community blesses my marriage.
B) Some states refuse to enforce my own particular religious beliefs on marriage on those two guys in line down at the courthouse.

3. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am being forced to use birth control.
B) I am unable to force others to not use birth control.

4. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am not allowed to pray privately.
B) I am not allowed to force others to pray the prayers of my faith publicly.

5. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I cannot say "Merry Christmas" in public places.
B) I cannot force people to say "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays."

6. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am not allowed to purchase, read or possess religious books or material.
B) Others are allowed to have access books, movies and websites that I do not like.

7. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) My religious group is not allowed equal protection under the establishment clause.
B) My religious group is not allowed to use public funds, buildings and resources as we would like, for whatever purposes we might like.

8. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) Another religious group has been declared the official faith of my country.
B) My own religious group is not given status as the official faith of my country.

9. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) My religious community is not allowed to build a house of worship in my community.
B) A religious community I do not like wants to build a house of worship in my community.

10. My religious liberty is at risk because:
A) I am not allowed to teach my children the creation stories of our faith at home.
B) Public school science classes are teaching science.

Scoring key:
If you answered "A" to any question, then perhaps your religious liberty is indeed at stake.

If you answered "B" to any question, then not only is your religious liberty not at stake, but there is a strong chance that you are oppressing the religious liberties of others.

[Mary Ann]

Hey Buzz:

Why isn't "tolerance" a two-way street?? Why doesn't the Gay SS want to "co-exist??" Why can't a gay couple who wants to serve pizza at their wedding just respect this restaurant owner's beliefs and use a different pizza restaurant?? Why FORCE someone to violate their own beliefs, just for pizza??

Buzz: I'm glad you're still here, because I really, really want an answer to these questions. Can you answer them for me?

Also, what if that poor naive girl had responded to the set-up, er--I mean "interview" by saying, "I have a stated right under the First Amendment to freely exercise my religious beliefs in my daily life, and in my case, that means how I run my business. So, why does your imaginary "right" to force me to supply pizzas for your "wedding" trump my stated Constitutional right?"

If she had said something to that effect, would that have shut down the Gay SS?

[BuzzClik]

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=101615.0
Here we see a muslin bakery not catering to a gay wedding.
There is no outrage. No boycott. no prosecutions.

The Left is only threatened by Christians standing for their rights. Liberals are hypocrites.

Wow. You really missed the point entirely.

The Muslim bakery was dead wrong and deserves to be sued under the law -- and can be. However, Indiana was changing the law to allow discrimination. The pizza place gleefully announced their delight at the new law, and paid a serious price. Until the right decided to prove conclusively that they do, indeed, totally support the concept bigotry based on sexual orientation.