D.C. is the best city for love on Valentine’s Day because it’s the most loveless

[Ptarmigan]

D.C. is the best city for love on Valentine’s Day because it’s the most loveless city, study says
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2015/02/12/d-c-is-the-best-city-for-love-on-valentines-day-because-its-the-most-loveless-city-study-says/

Washington has a lot of rich, single people and a lot of nice date spots, therefore it’s the best city to find love on Valentine’s Day. Or so goes the logic of a new Zillow study that awarded the District the dubious distinction of being the best city for finding love this Feb. 14.

Zillow, an online real estate database, looked at cities with a population of more than 250,000 people and determined which locales had a lot of date spots (restaurants, bars, movie theaters, etc.) and a high number of single people who could afford to fill these establishments. The rankings also took into account which cities had a high percentage of new residents because “you may benefit from an influx of fresh, single faces to prevent a dating scene where everyone knows everyone.”

The study does not address the fact that Washington may have a lot of singles because it could actually be a bad place to find love.

With all the politicians there, go figure. 

[Big Dog]

The ComPost doesn't define 'love'. What kind of love could a person find in that cesspool?

[DumbAss Tanker]

If your idea of a dream date involves finding someone with ruthless ambition, an ego the size of the Capitol, and the moral fiber of a slaver turned embezzler, it should work out great.

[Big Dog]

If your idea of a dream date involves finding someone with ruthless ambition, an ego the size of the Capitol, and the moral fiber of a slaver turned embezzler, it should work out great.

It seemed to work for the Clintons.

[DefiantSix]

The ComPost doesn't define 'love'. What kind of love could a person find in that cesspool?

Ask Bwahney Fwank...