How long will it take Yahoo Answers to pull this?

[WinOne4TheGipper]

How do you feel about the possibility of Bush & the whole regime hanging in the new Nuremberg trial?
15 minutes ago - 3 days left to answer.
Additional Details
4 minutes ago

Great responses! I will reply to as many questions as possible. To hang for war crimes. I think most of congress could partially be excused for failing to fight the war when you consider the outcome of their having pushed back against the patriot act. Can you say anthrax?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AolX_oSHdmlMQPnSFmcdYAzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20080527113137AAS1pC4&show=7#profile-info-pwrIiRFraa

I can only wish, the bush's have been betraying this country since his grandaddy helped Hitler

Not probable. If it happens, I'll be in line for a ticket.

[Lord Undies]

I don't think they are getting the answers they wanted. 

[Ralph Wiggum]

To hang for war crimes.

For the umpteenth time, what war crimes?

[Willow]

To hang for war crimes.

For the umpteenth time, what war crimes?

no war crimes just typical left wing hateriotics! they can't be patriots so they settle for hateriots! I heard that somewhere on the radio!

[Wretched Excess]

To hang for war crimes.

For the umpteenth time, what war crimes?

getting elected president according to the electoral college.

using force against iraq with the full authorization of congress.

you know, trampling on the constitution and stuff.

[Sonnabend]

My little contribution   

How do I feel? About the same as I feel about you and the following

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 41 > § 871

§ 871. Threats against President and successors to the Presidency

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(b) The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 19 and 20.

[VivisMom]

It's been reported to Yahoo. Who's gonna alert the Secret Service??? 

[WinOne4TheGipper]

Hmm, I'm having a field day with this question here...

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710110535AAYQXf2&r=w

Amazing how they'll do and say anything to justify abortion.

[RightCoast]

They truly are blabbering idiots.

[DumbAss Tanker]

IF there had been a war crime punishable by death (A "Grave breach"), the mere possibility of retribution as vague as the anthrax incident would not make out a legal defense of coercion.  Nor for that matter is coercion a defense to active participation in a crime, it is merely a defense to passive involvement until the earliest possible time to extricate oneself from the situation.  Therefore the DUmmies should be rooting for the execution of every Democrat in Congress who voted for war.  Of course the factual underpinning for that scenario only exists in their stupid little heads, not actually in this spacetime continuum.