How does 'dictatorial control of mass media' equate to 'a national dictatorship'? ![:confused:](https://conservativecave.com/home/Smileys/default/confused.gif)
Quit being an obtuse ****, you ****. You wanna play stupid little games we can but I'm pretty damned sure you'll be the one running crying (have you hit that alert link yet?).
OK, so you hate Obama. We all do, but save the paranoid ramblings. There's nothing inherently evil or anti-freedom about an EAS any more than its anti-freedom to have a standing army. There's lots of things I would not give a dictator but I'd gladly give those same things to a duly American president...and his successors.
This nation is bigger than Obama. If it isn't it wouldn't be worth a squirt of piss.
So Obama can get on the airwaves and say whatever he wants. Bully **** for him. What's he gonna do with it? Claim he's now president for life and the elections are cancelled?
It'd be his last ****ing mistake and our saving grace. Would that the paste-eater-in-chief actually try.
No one would back his play (go ahead and say the US military would accept that order...I double-dog ****ing dare you). Even 80% of the dems would desert him so he'd be impeached at a minimum.
How does an emergency alert system become dictatorial control of the mass media?