In order for them to be consistent, if harsh critism of Dear Leader is racist coming from conservatives then it's also racist coming from liberals. The only way it's not is if the libs are the one's determining the definition, in which case they claim their vision of reform for the country is vouched for by reason, by practice, and by their heart. It is equivalent for them to justice itself. So when they accept their own definition, then it is a contradiction in terms to accuse them of racism.
The libs charge that conservative opposition to Obama is racist is in part a cynical appeal to fear aimed at persuading blacks to continue voting for Democrats, but this could backfire. If the proposition being put forth by the black primitives are right, there is no reason to assume that the libs self-definition is widely accepted among blacks. Thus the libs harsh attacks on Obama are likely to look as racist as the conservatives' attacks do.
But the Angry Left is as predictable as it comes. The libs will rally behind Obama as soon as he has a legislative battle with the Republican House, and a year from now the talk of a primary challenge will be long forgotten. Obama will either win or lose re-election without rupturing the alliance between the two Democrat core constituencies, the kooks and blacks. The Dems perpetually use them over and over again and have for years. No reason to believe that will change.
.